We investigated how water transport capacity, wood density and wood anatomy were related to leaf photosynthetic traits in two lowland forests in Panama. Leaf-specific hydraulic conductivity (k L ) of upper branches was positively correlated with maximum rates of net CO 2 assimilation per unit leaf area (A area ) and stomatal conductance (g s ) across 20 species of canopy trees. Maximum k L showed stronger correlation with A area than initial k L suggesting that allocation to photosynthetic potential is proportional to maximum water transport capacity. Terminal branch k L was negatively correlated with A area /g s and positively correlated with photosynthesis per unit N, indicating a trade-off of efficient use of water against efficient use of N in photosynthesis as water transport efficiency varied. Specific hydraulic conductivity calculated from xylem anatomical characteristics (k theoretical ) was positively related to A area and k L , consistent with relationships among physiological measurements. Branch wood density was negatively correlated with wood water storage at saturation, k L , A area , net CO 2 assimilation per unit leaf mass (A mass ), and minimum leaf water potential measured on covered leaves, suggesting that wood density constrains physiological function to specific operating ranges. Kinetic and static indices of branch water transport capacity thus exhibit considerable co-ordination with allocation to potential carbon gain. Our results indicate that understanding tree hydraulic architecture provides added insights to comparisons of leaf level measurements among species, and links photosynthetic allocation patterns with branch hydraulic processes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.