No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The social background, farm characteristics, indicators of income and self-evaluation returns of 96 randomly selected users of a Basic Animal Health Service (BAHS) programme in northern Malawi were compared with those of 96 matched past-users and 96 non-users, respectively. All 288 farms were visited between July and October 1997. Data analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate techniques. The results showed that, on average, BAHS users had larger cattle herds (16.3) than part-users (14.7) or non-users (12.4). Similarly, the annual yields of crops were higher for users compared to either of the other groups. Users occupied better houses and owned a larger number of farm and household items than did part-users or non-users. A third of all farmers were engaged in additional income generation to lessen the risk of poverty. However, analysis of the livestock management and the educational background of the farmers suggested that usage of the BAHS programme was not only determined by already existing 'wealth'. Improved livestock husbandry and management measures, which do not require capital investment, were more frequently applied by users compared to either of the other groups. Non-users and part-users had attained a lower level of education, were less open towards improved farming methods and felt less knowledgeable than BAHS users. The average straight-line distances from farms using BAHS to their respective village animal health worker (2.2 km) or veterinary assistant (2.9 km) were similar but varied according to ecological zone. Intensified extension and awareness meetings in villages will be required to get more non-users involved in BAHS.

A total of 156 chickens in two villages in Malawi were marked and sampled. One hundred and fifteen of these were vaccinated against Newcastle disease immediately after blood sampling, using the V4 heat-resistant strain applied by eye-drop in one village and the inactivated Newcavac vaccine in the other village. A second blood sample was collected 4 weeks after vaccination. The samples were examined using an indirect ELISA test kit. The titre group median ranged from 2 to 3 before vaccination. Both vaccines led to a positive immune response. Newcavac induced higher and more homogeneous titres compared with the V4 vaccine. There was also an increase in the median of the control group where V4 live vaccine had been applied. The differences between the median titres induced by V4, Newcavac and controls were statistically significant.