The epidermal growth factor receptor directed antibody, cetuximab, is an effective clinical therapy for patients with colorectal, head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer patients particularly for those with KRAS and BRAF wild type cancers. Treatment in all patients is limited eventually by the development of acquired resistance but little is known about the underlying mechanism. Here we show, that activation of ERBB2 signaling, either through ERBB2 amplification or through heregulin upregulation, leads to persistent ERK 1/2 signaling and consequently cetuximab resistance. Inhibition of ERBB2 or disruption of ERBB2/ERBB3 heterodimerization restores cetuximab sensitivity in vitro and in vivo. A subset of colorectal cancer patients that exhibit either de novo or acquired resistance to cetuximab based therapy possess ERBB2 amplification or high levels of circulating heregulin. Collectively, these findings identify two distinct resistance mechanisms, both of which promote aberrant ERBB2 signaling, that mediate cetuximab resistance. Moreover, these results suggest that ERBB2 inhibitors, in combination with cetuximanb, represent a rational therapeutic strategy that should be assessed in cetuximab-resistant cancers.

UMIN000001396.

We carried out a phase I/II trial of adding 2-weekly docetaxel to cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) therapy (2-weekly DCF regimen) in esophageal cancer patients to investigate its safety and antimetastatic activity. Patients received 2-weekly docetaxel (30 mg/m2 [dose level (DL)1] or 40 mg/m2 [DL2] with a 3 + 3 design in phase I, on days 1 and 15) in combination with fixed-dose CF (80 mg/m2 cisplatin, day 1; 800 mg/m2 fluorouracil, days 1–5) repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in phase I and central peer review-based response rate in phase II. At least 22 responders among 50 patients were required to satisfy the primary endpoint with a threshold of 35%. Sixty-two patients were enrolled in phase I and II. In phase I, 10 patients were enrolled with DLT of 0/3 at DL1 and 2/7 in DL2. Considering DLT and treatment compliance, the recommended phase II dose was determined as DL1. In phase II, the response rate was 62% (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 48–75%); median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.1 and 5.8 months, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (25%), anemia (36%), hyponatremia (29%), anorexia (24%), and nausea (11%). No febrile neutropenia was observed. Pneumonitis caused treatment-related death in one patient. The 2-weekly DCF regimen showed promising antimetastatic activity and tolerability. A phase III study comparing this regimen with CF therapy is planned by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN 000001737.

ObjectivesNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been used to determine the outcome in malignancies and coronary heart disease. Some reports considered the value of NLR as a predictor of response to infliximab in patients with Crohn’s disease or rheumatoid arthritis; however, no similar studies have been reported for ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the baseline NLR in patients with UC treated by infliximab.Materials and MethodsPatients with moderate-to-severe active UC who received the first infliximab infusion in our hospital between 2010 and 2015, who showed clinical response during the induction period, were retrospectively evaluated for long-term outcomes and risk factors for loss of response (LOR) during infliximab maintenance therapy. Baseline inflammatory markers including NLR were measured within one week before the initiation of infliximab.ResultsFifty-nine patients with moderate-to-severe active UC started treatment with infliximab and 37 patients (62.7%) experienced clinical response after induction therapy. Fourteen of 37 patients on maintenance therapy lost the response during follow-up. Baseline NLR of patients with LOR was significantly higher than in patients with sustained response. The NLR cut-off value of 4.488 was predictive of LOR, using receiver operating characteristic analysis (sensitivity: 78.6%, specificity: 78.3%). A univariate analysis revealed a significant relationship between relapse-free survival and the NLR (P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis indicated the NLR as an independent prognostic factor for LOR (hazard ratio = 3.86, 95% confidence interval: 1.20–12.4, P = 0.023).ConclusionsBaseline NLR is a useful prognostic marker in patients with moderate-to-severe active UC treated with infliximab, and may contribute to appropriate use of infliximab.

Resections involving circumferential mucosal defects of more than five-sixths increased the likelihood of stricture formation in patients given prophylactic locoregional triamcinolone injections after esophageal ESD.