Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with >5 fraction (fr) has been increasingly adopted for brain metastases (BMs), given the current awareness of limited brain tolerance for ≤5 fr. The target volume/configuration change and/or deviation within the cranium during fractionated SRS can be unpredictable and critical uncertainties affecting treatment accuracy, plus the effect of these events on the long-term outcome remains uncertain. Herein, we describe a case of two challenging BMs treated by 10 fr SRS with a unique dose-gradient optimization strategy, in which the large cystic tumor revealed an intriguing correlation of such inter-fractional change with late radiographic sequela, suggesting a dose threshold for attaining longterm local tumor control and being immune to symptomatic brain necrosis.A 63-year-old man presented with two cystic lesions located in the left parietal lobe (19.9 cm 3 ) and pons (1.1 cm 3 ) one month after surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The principles for 10 fr SRS were as follows: (1) very inhomogeneous gross tumor volume (GTV) dose covered by 53 Gy, biologically effective dose with an alpha/beta ratio of 10 (BED 10 ) of ≥80 Gy; (2) moderate dose spillage margin outside the GTV boundary: 2-2.5 mm outside the GTV margin was covered by 37 Gy, BED 10 of ≈50 Gy; (3) concentricallylaminated, steep dose increase inside the GTV boundary: 2 mm inside the GTV margin was covered by ≥62 Gy, BED 10 of ≥100 Gy. At the completion of SRS, the parietal lesion showed significant shrinking and dorsomedial shifting with slight evisceration of the GTV, followed by marked regression of the parietal lesion within four months. At 13.5 months, a cystic change was noted at the dorsal part of the remnant. At 16.7 months, ventral enhancement gradually expanded without enlargement of the dorsal cystic component. On the T2-weighted images, the dorsal low-intensity remnant and ventral iso-intensity blurry-demarcated component were contrasting. Pathological examinations during and after lesionectomy at 17.4 months revealed necrosis only. At 30.5 months, the patient had a left visual field defect without recurrence. In contrast, the pons lesion showed no notable change during 10 fr SRS and nearly complete remission over six months with its sustainment without radiation injury at 30.5 months.Taken together, 10 fr SRS with a sufficient BED 10 can provide superior tumor response and safety for BM that is not amenable to ≤5 fr SRS. Although a very inhomogeneous GTV dose can contribute to early and adequate tumor shrinkage and subsequent local tumor eradication, significant tumor shrinkage during fractionated SRS (fSRS) inevitably results in unnecessary higher dose exposure to the surrounding brain, which could lead to late radiation injury requiring intervention. The optimum dose should be determined through further investigation, in consideration of the dynamic and unpredictable nature of the actual absorbed doses to both the tumor and the surrounding brain.
IntroductionSingle or multi-fraction (mf) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an indispensable treatment option for brain metastases (BMs). The integration of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) into linac-based SRS is expected to further enhance efficacy and safety and to expand the indications for the challenging type of BMs. However, the optimal treatment design and relevant optimization method for volumetric modulated arc-based radiosurgery (VMARS) remain unestablished with substantial inter-institutional differences. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the optimal dose distribution suitable for VMARS of BMs, especially regarding dose inhomogeneity of the gross tumor volume (GTV). The GTV boundary, not marginadded planning target volume, was regarded as a basis for planning optimization and dose prescription. Materials and methodsThis was a planning study for the clinical scenario of a single BM. Eight sphere-shaped objects with diameters of 5-40 mm in 5-mm increments were assumed as GTVs. The treatment system included a 5-mm leaf width multileaf collimator (MLC) Agility® (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and a dedicated planning system Monaco® (Elekta AB). The prescribed dose (PD) was uniformly assigned to just cover 98% of the GTV (D 98% ). Three VMARS plans with different dose inhomogeneities of the GTV were generated for each GTV: the % isodose surfaces (IDSs) of GTV D 98% , normalized to 100% at the maximum dose (D max ), were ≤70% (extremely inhomogeneous dose, EIH); ≈80% (inhomogeneous dose, IH); and ≈90% (rather homogeneous dose, RH). VMARS plans were optimized using simple and similar cost functions. In particular, no dose constraint to the GTV D max was assigned to the EIH plans. ResultsIntended VMARS plans fulfilling the prerequisites were generated without problems for all GTVs of ≥10 mm, whereas 86.4% was the lowest IDS for the D 98% for 5-mm GTV. Therefore, additional plans for 9-and 8-mm GTVs were generated, which resulted in 68.6% and 75.1% being the lowest IDSs for the D 98% values of 9-and 8-mm GTVs, respectively. The EIH plans were the best in terms of the following: 1) dose conformity, i.e., minimum spillage of PD outside the GTV; 2) moderate, not too excessive, dose attenuation outside the GTV, i.e., appropriate marginal dose 2-mm outside the GTV boundary as a function of GTV size; and 3) lowest dose of the surrounding normal tissue outside the GTV. In contrast, the RH plans were the worst based on all of the aforementioned measures. ConclusionsOn the assumption of uniform dose assignment to the GTV margin, a very inhomogeneous GTV dose is basically the most suitable for SRS of BMs in terms of 1) superior dose conformity; 2) minimizing the dose of the surrounding normal tissue outside the GTV; and 3) moderate dose spillage margin outside the GTV with a tumor volume-dependent rational increase, i.e., appropriate dose of the common PTV boundary. The concentrically laminated steep dose increase inside the GTV boundary for the EIH plan may also be advantageous for achieving super...
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with >5 fractions (fr) has been increasingly adopted to improve local control and safety for brain metastases (BM) of >10 cm 3 , given the limited brain tolerance of SRS with ≤5 fr. However, the optimal indication and treatment design, including the prescribed dose and distribution for 10 fr SRS, remains uncertain. A single fr of 24 Gy provides approximately 95% of the one-year local tumor control probability. The potential SRS doses in 10 fr that is clinically equivalent to a single fr of 24 Gy regarding anti-tumor effect range from 48.4 to 81.6 Gy as biological effective doses (BED) as a function of the BED model formulas along with the alpha/beta ratios. The most appropriate BED formula in conjunction with an alpha/beta ratio to estimate similar anti-BM effects for single and 10 fr remains controversial.Herein, we describe four cases of symptomatic radiation-naïve BM >10 cm 3 (range, 11 to 26 cm 3 ), treated with 10 fr SRS with a standard prescribed dose of 42 Gy, for which modified dynamic conformal arcs were used with forward planning to improve dose conformity. In the first two cases with gross tumor volumes (GTV) of 15.3 and 10.9 cm 3 , 42 Gy was prescribed to 70%-80% isodose, normalized to 100% at the isocenter, which encompasses the boundary of the planning target volume: GTV + isotropic 1 mm margin. The tumor responses were initially marked regression followed by regrowth within three months in case 1 and no shrinkage with subsequent progression within three months in case 2. In the remaining two cases with larger GTVs of 19.1 and 26.2 cm 3 , the GTV boundary and 2-3 mm margin-added object volume was covered by 80% and 56% isodoses with 53 Gy and 37 Gy, respectively, to further increase the marginal and internal doses of GTV and to ensure moderate dose spillage outside the GTV, while >1-1.5 mm outside the GTV was covered by 42 Gy with 63% isodose. According to the BED based on the linear-quadratic (LQ) model with an alpha/beta ratio of 10 (BED 10 ), 53 Gy corresponds to approximately 81 Gy in BED 10 and 24 Gy in a single fr.Excellent initial maximum tumor response and subsequently sustained tumor regression (STR) were achieved in both cases. Subsequently, enlarging nodules that could not exclude the possibility of tumor regrowth were disclosed within two years, while late adverse radiation effects remained moderate.These dose-effect relationships suggest that a GTV marginal dose of ≥53 Gy with ≤80% isodose would be preferred to effect ≥1-year STR and that further dose escalation of both marginal and internal GTV may be necessary to achieve ≥2-year STR, while GTV of >25 cm 3 may be unsuitable for 10 fr SRS in terms of longterm brain tolerance. Among LQ, LQ-cubic, and LQ-linear model formulas and alpha/beta ratios of 10-20, BED 10 may be clinically most suitable to estimate a 10 fr SRS dose that provides anti-BM efficacy similar to that for a single fr.
Dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) are a widely used technique for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) using a micro-multileaf collimator (mMLC), while the planning design and method considerably vary among institutions. In the usual forward planning of DCA, the steepness of the dose gradient outside and inside the gross tumor volume (GTV) boundary is simply defined by the leaf margin (LM) setting to the target volume edge. The dose fall-off outside the small GTV tends to be excessively precipitous, especially with an MLC of 2.5-mm leaf width, which is predisposed to the insufficient coverage of microscopic brain invasion and other inherent inaccuracies. Meanwhile, insufficient dose increase inside the GTV boundary, i.e., less inhomogeneous GTV dose, likely leads to inferior and less sustainable tumor response. The more inhomogeneous GTV dose is prone to the steeper dose gradient outside the GTV and vice versa. Herein, we describe an alternative simply modified DCA (mDCA) planning that was uniquely devised to optimize the dose gradient outside and inside the GTV boundary for further enhancing and consolidating local control of small BM.For a succinct exemplification, a 10-mm spherical target was assumed as a GTV for DCA planning using a 2.5-mm mMLC. The benchmark plan was generated by adding a 0-mm LM to the GTV edge by assigning a single fraction of 30 Gy to the isocenter, in which the GTV coverage by 24 Gy with 80% isodose surface (IDS) was 96%, i.e., D 96% , while the coverage of GTV + isotropic 2 mm volume by 18 Gy with 60% IDS was 70%, with the D 98% being 12 Gy with 40% IDS, viz., too steep dose fall-off outside the GTV boundary.Alternatively, the increase of LM with or without decreasing the isocenter dose enables the increase of the GTV + 2 mm coverage by 18 Gy while resulting in an inadequate GTV dose with either a less inhomogeneous dose or an excessive marginal dose. Meanwhile, in the newly devised mDCA planning, every single arc was converted to a double to-and-fro arc with different LM settings under the same spatial arrangement, which enabled GTV + 2 mm volume coverage with 18 Gy while preserving the GTV marginal dose and inhomogeneity similar to those for the benchmark plan. Additionally, the different collimator angle (CA) setting for the to-and-fro arcs led to further trimming of the dose conformity.The limitations of general forward planning with only adjusting the LM for every single arc were demonstrated, which can be a contributing factor for local tumor progression of small BM. Alternatively, the mDCA with each double to-and-fro arc and different LM and CA settings enables optimization of the dose gradient both outside and inside the GTV boundary according to the planners' intent, e.g., moderate dose spillage margin outside the GTV and steep dose increase inside the GTV boundary.
Brain metastases (BMs) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have the tendency of slow and insufficient tumor shrinkage along with prolongation of massive peritumoral edema following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Herein, we describe a case of large lobar RCC-BM, with possible intra-sulcal location, treated with 7-fraction (fr) SRS without subsequent anti-cancer medication, which resulted in gradual and remarkable tumor shrinkage with extrication from the mass effect.A 59-year-old woman was incidentally diagnosed with bilateral RCC associated with multiple lung metastases and subsequently presented with symptomatic single BM of 32 mm in the maximum diameter (9.54 cm 3 ) two months later while vacillating. A biopsy of the kidney showed clear cell carcinoma. The patient was deemed medically inoperable for BM due to unfit conditions, including severe deep venous thromboses and thrombocytopenia. Considering the tumor volume, irregular tumor configuration, nonsuperficial location, and mass effect, 98% of the gross tumor volume (GTV D 98% ) was covered by 48.3 Gy in 7 fr with 64% isodose. Dose distribution was optimized with volumetric modulated arcs with the affirmative allowance of very inhomogeneous GTV dose. Anti-cancer medication was limited to nivolumab plus ipilimumab followed by everolismus 12 days before and during SRS, respectively. Subsequently, the patient transitioned to palliative care due to a declining general condition. Although long-term administration of steroids was required, gradual and marked tumor shrinkage (1.25 cm 3 , 13.1% of the initial volume) and mitigation of the peritumoral edema was observed during six months after SRS. The main location of the initial BM was deemed as intra-sulcal in the intraparietal sulcus and originated in the cerebral cortex. The patient died nine months after SRS.The gradual but remarkable tumor response obtained with 7-fr SRS alone, in this case, provides a basis to further optimize fractionated SRS dosage to enhance efficacy and safety for large and/or symptomatic RCC-BMs not amenable to immediate surgical removal, in combination with anti-cancer pharmacotherapy, if feasible, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which may enhance efficacy against BM and mitigate adverse effects relevant to high dose SRS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.