Here we describe the phenotypic characteristics of a single craniofacial clinic population of 294 individuals affected with oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia (OAV) and variants. To our knowledge, this is the largest population so described in the literature. The study population was divided into five subgroups based on the presence of combinations of minimal diagnostic criteria: microtia, mandibular hypoplasia, anomalies of the cervical spine and/or epibulbar or lipodermoids. The following data were recorded: sex (M:F 191:103); race (78% Caucasian); the presence of unilateral or bilateral microtia (193 unilateral, 98 bilateral); the presence of symmetric microtia in bilateral cases (34/98); the presence of mandibular hypoplasia ipsilateral or contralateral to the microtic ear or most severely microtic ear in bilateral cases (135/137 were ipsilateral in unilateral cases, 55/62 were ipsilateral in bilateral cases); the number of individuals with no other congenital anomaly in addition to the minimal diagnostic criteria (154/294), with only one other congenital anomaly (51/294), and with two or more other congenital anomalies (89/294); and the type of other congenital anomalies. Finally, we compared our results with other studies. Findings from our study include: mandibular asymmetry should be expected in patients with unilateral or bilateral microtia; bilateral involvement is frequent in patients with microtia; other malformations are seen frequently in all subgroups; anomalies of the cervical spine are more likely to be associated with other anomalies; and other malformations are seen in all systems and should be searched for to provide optimal management.

Seventy-four families of probands with oculoauriculovertebral anomaly were evaluated, including 116 parents and 195 offspring. Relatives were examined to identify ear malformations, mandibular anomalies, and other craniofacial abnormalities. For segregation analysis using POINTER, selection of the sample was consistent with single ascertainment. Different population liabilities were used for probands and relatives, because affection was narrowly defined for probands and broadly defined for relatives. The hypothesis of no genetic transmission was rejected. The evidence favored autosomal dominant inheritance; recessive and polygenic models were not distinguishable.

Terms such as oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia, Goldenhar syndrome, and hemifacial microsomia have been used to describe microtia with specific combinations of other craniofacial anomalies. Microtia is also observed with anomalies of postcranial structures. Statistical studies were performed on 297 patients with microtia and other anomalies to identify subgroups of patients representing previously described or new associations. Analysis identified 15 subgroups of patients with specific patterns of anomalies. Log-linear analyses of cranial and postcranial variables demonstrated a positive association between mandibular hypoplasia and cervical spine fusion, which was, in turn, positively associated with other spine anomalies (P less than .02) and other skeletal anomalies (P less than .001). Although unilateral microtia was commonly observed with mandibular hypoplasia, mandibular hypoplasia was negatively associated with bilateral microtia. Many of the associated anomalies were of structures not derived from the 1st and 2nd branchial arch neural crest. However, most associated anomalies were of structures derived from migratory cell populations or populations undergoing differentiation prior to migration between the 19th and 24th day post-fertilization (neural crest, ectodermal placode, mesoderm, surface ectoderm). These findings suggest that many different cell populations may be disturbed in the pathogenesis of microtia in association with other anomalies. The timing of the pathogenetic event may determine the specific pattern of associated anomalies.