No abstract

Background: Opioid use, abuse, and adverse consequences, including death, have escalated at an alarming rate since the 1990s. In an attempt to control opioid abuse, numerous regulations and guidelines for responsible opioid prescribing have been developed by various organizations. However, the US opioid epidemic is continuing and drug dose deaths tripled during 1999 to 2015. Recent data show a continuing increase in deaths due to natural and semisynthetic opioids, a decline in methadone deaths, and an explosive increase in the rates of deaths involving other opioids, specifically heroin and illicit synthetic fentanyl. Contrary to scientific evidence of efficacy and negative recommendations, a significant proportion of physicians and patients (92%) believe that opioids reduce pain and a smaller proportion (57%) report better quality of life. In preparation of the current guidelines, we have focused on the means to reduce the abuse and diversion of opioids without jeopardizing access for those patients suffering from non-cancer pain who have an appropriate medical indication for opioid use. Objectives: To provide guidance for the prescription of opioids for the management of chronic non-cancer pain, to develop a consistent philosophy among the many diverse groups with an interest in opioid use as to how appropriately prescribe opioids, to improve the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain and to reduce the likelihood of drug abuse and diversion. These guidelines are intended to provide a systematic and standardized approach to this complex and difficult arena of practice, while recognizing that every clinical situation is unique. Methods: The methodology utilized included the development of objectives and key questions. The methodology also utilized trustworthy standards, appropriate disclosures of conflicts of interest, as well as a panel of experts from various specialties and groups. The literature pertaining to opioid use, abuse, effectiveness, and adverse consequences was reviewed, with a best evidence synthesis of the available literature, and utilized grading for recommendation as described by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subcallosal cingulate white matter (SCC) has shown promise as an intervention for patients with chronic, unremitting depression (TRD). To test the safety and efficacy of DBS for TRD, a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trial was conducted. Methods: Participants with TRD were implanted with a DBS system targeting bilateral SCC white matter and randomized to six months of active versus sham DBS followed by six months open-label SCC DBS. The primary outcome was response rate at the end of the six-month double-blind phase. Response was defined as a 40% or greater reduction in depression severity from baseline. A futility analysis was performed when approximately half of the proposed sample received DBS implantation and completed the double-blind phase. At the conclusion of the 12-month study, a subset of patients continued to be followed for up to 24 months. Findings: Prior to the futility analysis, 90 participants were randomized to active (N=60) versus sham (N=30) stimulation. Both groups showed improvement, but there was no statistically significant difference in response rate during the double-blind, sham-controlled phase. Participants continued to improve during the six months open-label phase. Long-term response and remission rates for all participants receiving active DBS open-label were, respectively, 40% and 19% at 12 months, 51%

No abstract

Clinical trials.gov (NCT00615342).