BackgroundThe diagnosis of COPD is not always consistent with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy in daily clinical practice, especially in primary care. This study aimed to estimate the overall COPD prevalence and severity, to identify differences between newly and previously diagnosed patients, and to evaluate the potential COPD overtreatment in a smoking population attending a primary care spirometry surveillance program.MethodsA study was conducted in 10 primary health care centers of Central Greece during a 7-month period. Eligible participants were aged ≥40 years and were either current smokers or exsmokers.ResultsA total of 186 subjects were included (68% males, mean age 62.3±12.6 years, mean life-time tobacco exposure 50 pack-years). COPD prevalence was 17.8%, identified to be higher in elderly males. Forty-two percent of the COPD group were newly diagnosed patients, who were of younger age, current smokers, presented with less dyspnea and better health status, and mainly appeared with mild-to-moderate disease. Interestingly, 61.4% of non-COPD and 85.7% of newly diagnosed COPD individuals had been using inhaled medication under primary care provider’s prescription without ever undergoing spirometry or further evaluation by a pulmonologist; thus, the phenomena of COPD overdiagnosis and missed diagnosis came into the spotlight. Moreover, only 26.3% of known COPD patients were properly medicated according to GOLD guidelines, while half of them were inappropriately treated with triple inhaled therapy.ConclusionWe reported a significant prevalence of COPD in smoking population attending this spirometry program. A remarkable proportion of COPD patients were undiagnosed and made case finding worthwhile. Underutilization of spirometry in the diagnosis and management of COPD as well as general practitioners’ nonadherence to the GOLD treatment guidelines was confirmed by our data. These findings highlight the need for a major overhaul and culture change in primary care settings of Central Greece.
All authors: Final approval of the version submitted for publication; and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
It is widely known that blood stream infections (BSIs) in critically ill patients may affect mortality, length of stay, or the duration of mechanical ventilation. There is scarce data regarding blood stream infections in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. Preliminary studies report that the number of secondary infections in COVID-9 patients may be higher. This retrospective analysis was conducted to determine the incidence of BSI. Furthermore, risk factors, mortality, and other outcomes were analyzed. The setting was an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at a University Hospital. Patients suffering from SARS-CoV-2 infection and requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) for >48 h were eligible. The characteristics of patients who presented BSI were compared with those of patients who did not present BSI. Eighty-four patients were included. The incidence of BSI was 57%. In most cases, multidrug-resistant pathogens were isolated. Dyslipidemia was more frequent in the BSI group (p < 0.05). Moreover, BSI-group patients had a longer ICU stay and a longer duration of both mechanical ventilation and sedation (p < 0.05). Deaths were not statistically different between the two groups (73% for BSI and 56% for the non-BSI group, p > 0.05). Compared with non-survivors, survivors had lower baseline APACHE II and SOFA scores, lower D-dimers levels, a higher baseline compliance of the respiratory system, and less frequent heart failure. They received anakinra less frequently and appropriate therapy more often (p < 0.05). The independent risk factor for mortality was the APACHE II score [1.232 (1.017 to 1.493), p = 0.033].
Aim: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating lung disorder that is characterized by aggressive and dysbalanced wound healing. IPF is mainly a disease of the elderly and thus is likely to share common pathophysiologic mechanisms with other more age-related diseases. Emerging evidence has linked disturbance of sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) expression and activity with aging and diseases of the elderly. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate SIRT1 expression in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with IPF given the lack of studies in the literature.Methods: We enrolled 34 IPF patients and 22 healthy volunteers (age and sex-matched). In both groups, SIRT1 levels were assessed in plasma, cell pellets of PBMCs, and supernatant from PBMCs' culture with and without the addition of 10% human serum. We also measured transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) concentration in plasma from IPF patients and controls.Results: The mean (SD) age (years) of the healthy volunteers was 68.57±6.97 and of the IPF patients was 71.28±5.39 years (p>0.05). The mean SIRT1 concentration was found significantly decreased in the supernatant of PBMCs culture (without the addition of serum) in IPF subjects versus controls (1.97±0.59 ng/ml versus 2.40±0.74 ng/ml, respectively, p=0.047). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the SIRT1 concentration of all the other materials. TGFβ1 concentration of IPF subjects was significantly increased when compared to controls (1281.38±2742.74 versus 131.11±156.06 ng/ml, respectively, p=0.032). Decreased SIRT1 levels in no-serum supernatant were predictive of IPF, after adjustment for age and sex (p=0.014, OR=0.124 [95%CI: 0.023-0.653]). Conclusion:The findings of decreased concentration of SIRT1 in PBMCs supernatant and increased concentration of TGFβ1 in plasma in IPF patients versus controls provide important insights into the role of SIRT1 in IPF and could serve as a tool for the diagnosis and evaluation of patients with IPF.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.