Objective St John's Wort, a widely used herbal product, is an inducer of CYP3A4 and it decreases blood concentrations of CYP3A4 substrates. The effects of St John's Wort on the pharmacokinetics of 3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors simvastatin (an inactive lactone pro‐drug) and pravastatin were determined in this study. Methods Sixteen healthy male subjects (n = 8 in group 1 and n = 8 in group 2) took a St John's Wort caplet (300 mg) or matching placebo three times a day for 14 days in a double‐blind, crossover study. On day 14, a single oral dose of 10 mg simvastatin and 20 mg pravastatin was given to subjects in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Blood samples were obtained during a 24‐hour period after the administration of each drug. Results Repeated St John's Wort treatment tended to lower plasma simvastatin concentration and significantly (P < .05) lowered concentrations of simvastatin hydroxy acid, its active metabolite. The peak concentration in plasma (ratio, 0.72 of placebo) of simvastatin hydroxy acid tended to be decreased and its area under the plasma concentration‐time curve between time zero and 24 hours after administration (ratio, 0.48 of placebo) was significantly decreased (P < .05) by St John's Wort. On the other hand, St John's Wort did not influence plasma pravastatin concentration. No significant differences were observed in the elimination half‐life of simvastatin or pravastatin between the placebo and St John's Wort trials. Conclusions This study showed that St John's Wort decreases plasma concentrations of simvastatin but not of pravastatin. Because simvastatin is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4 in the intestinal wall and liver, which are induced by St John's Wort, it is likely that this interaction is partly caused by the enhancement of the CYP3A4‐mediated first‐pass metabolism of simvastatin in the small intestine and liver. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2001) 70, 518–524; doi:

We encountered two cases of pediatric living-related liver transplant recipients who showed increases in blood concentration of cyclosporine or tacrolimus, a dual substrate for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), during a diarrheal episode. To investigate the effect of intestinal inflammation on the metabolic and efflux pump activities, we conducted the experiments using the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced intestinal damage model. Intestinal epithelial CYP3A activity was assessed by nifedipine oxidation using intestinal epithelial microsomes in rat. Drug efflux by P-gp was tested using digoxin flux with the excised intestine perfusion system in rats. Intraperitoneal injection of LPS (0.3 mg/kg) significantly reduced the intestinal epithelial CYP3A activity by 41% (p < 0.01). In the proximal jejunal segment of the rats treated with LPS, mucosal to serosal flux of digoxin was significantly enhanced compared to that of control (p < 0.05). Efflux of digoxin, which was taken up by intestinal epithelium, to mucosal perfusate was significantly blunted in the jejunum treated with LPS (p < 0.05), which indicates that the LPS treatment reduced the P-gp activity in rat small intestine. These findings suggest that the suppression of CYP3A and P-gp activities may be involved in the mechanism of elevated blood concentrations of cyclosporine and tacrolimus during enteritis-induced diarrhea. To prevent a drug-induced adverse effect, dose of a drug, which is a substrate of CYP3A or P-gp, should be reduced during such an episode.

A 72-year-old woman with renal insufficiency who was taking oral pilsicainide (150 mg/d) complained of feeling faint 3 days after she was prescribed oral cetirizine (20 mg/d). She was found to have a wide QRS wave with bradycardia. Her symptoms were relieved by termination of pilsicainide. The plasma concentrations of both drugs were significantly increased during the coadministration, and the cetirizine concentration decreased on cessation of pilsicainide despite the fact that treatment with cetirizine was continued, which suggested that the fainting was induced by the pharmacokinetic drug interaction. A pharmacokinetic study in 6 healthy male volunteers after a single dose of either cetirizine (20 mg) or pilsicainide (50 mg), or both, found that the renal clearance of each drug was significantly decreased by the coadministration of the drugs (from 475 +/- 101 mL/min to 279 +/- 117 mL/min for pilsicainide and from 189 +/- 37 mL/min to 118 +/- 28 mL/min for cetirizine; P = .008 and .009, respectively). In vitro studies using Xenopus oocytes with microinjected human organic cation transporter 2 and renal cells transfected with human multidrug resistance protein 1 revealed that the transport of the substrates of these transporters was inhibited by either cetirizine or pilsicainide. Thus elevated concentrations of these drugs as a result of a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction via either human multidrug resistance protein 1 or human organic cation transporter 2 (or both) in the renal tubular cells might have caused the arrhythmia in our patient. Although cetirizine has less potential for causing arrhythmias than other histamine 1 blockers, such an interaction should be considered, especially in patients with renal insufficiency who are receiving pilsicainide.

No abstract