Histopathologic assessment is considered essential for the differentiation of recurrent hepatitis C (RHC) from acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation (LT); however, there is limited information regarding its reliability. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the histopathologic diagnosis of RHC vs. ACR, and to determine the reliability of specific histopathologic features for the differentiation of RHC from ACR. Liver biopsy specimens from 105 consecutive patients transplanted for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease were studied retrospectively. All the biopsies were performed for evaluation of abnormal liver enzymes within the 1st year after LT. The slides were blindly coded and assessed by 5 liver-transplant pathologists, practicing at 3 medical centers. The pathologists were asked to render a diagnosis, and determine the severity of the disease. Four of the pathologists were asked to determine the presence and severity of 36 histopathologic features. A total of 34 of the samples were then blindly resubmitted to each of the 4 pathologists to determine the intraobserver agreement. There was a slight agreement ( ‫؍‬ .12) among the 5 pathologists on the histopathologic diagnosis. All 5 pathologists were in agreement on the diagnosis of RHC in only 5 patients (5%) and on the diagnosis of ACR in only 2 patients (2%). The best agreement among any 4 pathologists was fair ( ‫؍‬ .20). Slight to moderate agreement occurred on the main histological features considered to be important in the diagnosis of ACR. Intraobserver agreement ranged from slight ( ‫؍‬ .19) to moderate ( ‫؍‬ .42) among 4 pathologists. In conclusion, the histopathologic differentiation of RHC from ACR after LT had relatively low interobserver and intraobserver agreement rates, and hence showed low reliability. Histopathologic assessment should be used cautiously for the differentiation of RHC from ACR post-LT. (Liver

No abstract

Parent nutrition and physical activity patterns significantly influence their preschool-age children's consumption of fruits/vegetables, junk food, and level of sedentary behavior. Future obesity prevention intervention efforts targeting this age group should include parents as healthy lifestyle role models for their children.

In live donor liver transplantation, rigorous standardized criteria for matching of liver volume between donor and recipient have prevented graft loss because of size mismatch. In deceased whole liver transplantation, the safe donor-recipient size mismatch range remains unknown. We developed a multivariate survival model (generalized additive model) to estimate hazard risk of body surface area index (BSAi) for 3-year graft survival using data derived from the national registry database between 2005 and 2010. BSAi was calculated by BSA of donor divided by BSA of recipient. 24 509 patients were included in the analysis. Small-for-size (SFS) grafts with BSAi less than 0.78 had a significant impact on graft dysfunction with progressive increase of hazard risk toward the lowest end and a higher incidence of primary graft nonfunction and vascular thrombosis. Large-for-size (LFS) grafts with BSAi greater than 1.24 had a significant impact on graft dysfunction with progressive increase of hazard risk toward the largest end. Our findings suggest that donor grafts with BSAi < 0.78 could be considered 'SFS' and donor grafts with BSAi > 1.24 could be considered 'LFS', with both extremes resulting in decreased graft survival. Therefore, BSAi > 0.78 and <1.24 appears to be a safe range to avoid adverse outcome associated with size mismatch.