A crosscut language is used to describe at which points an aspect crosscuts a program. An important issue is how these points can be captured using the crosscut language without introducing tight coupling between the aspect and the program. Such tight coupling harms the evolvability of the program and the reusability of the aspect. Current patternbased capturing already offers a certain decoupling between aspects and the program but it may still suffer from what we call the arranged pattern problem. In this paper, we discuss this problem and present a logic-based crosscut language from which we distill what language features are beneficial to avoid this problem.

Abstract. In spite of the more advanced modularisation mechanisms, aspect-oriented programs still suffer from evolution problems. Due to the fragile pointcut problem, seemingly safe modifications to the base code of an aspect-oriented program can have an unexpected impact on the semantics of the pointcuts defined in that program. This can lead to broken aspect functionality due to accidental join point misses and unintended join point captures. We tackle this problem by declaring pointcuts in terms of a conceptual model of the base program, rather than defining them directly in terms of how the base program is structured. As such, we achieve an effective decoupling of the pointcuts from the base program's structure. In addition, the conceptual model provides a means to verify where and why potential fragile pointcut conflicts occur, by imposing structural and semantic constraints on the conceptual model, that can be verified when the base program evolves. To validate our approach we implemented a model-based pointcut mechanism, which we used to define some aspects on SmallWiki, a medium-sized application, and subsequently detected and resolved occurrences of the fragile pointcut problem when this application evolved.

No abstract

Meta programming is the act of reasoning about a computational system. For example, a program in Prolog can reason about a program written in Smalltalk. Reflection is a more powerful form of meta programming where the same language is used to reason about, and act upon, itself in a causally connected way. Thus on the one hand we have meta programming that allows different languages or paradigms to be used, but without causal connection, while on the other hand we have reflection that offers causal connection but only for a single language. This paper combines both and presents inter-language reflection that allows one language to reason about and change in a causally connected way another language and vice versa. The fundamental aspects of inter-language reflection and the language symbiosis used therein, are discussed. Moreover the implementation of two symbiotic reflective languages is discussed: Agora/Java and SOUL/Smalltalk.

Software applications often contain implicit knowledge in addition to functionality which is inherently object-oriented. Many approaches and systems exist that focus on separating rule-based knowledge from object-oriented functionality and representing it explicitly in a logic reasoning system. Support for seamless integration of this knowledge with the object-oriented functionality improves software development and evolution. Our hypothesis is that a linguistic symbiosis is required between the logic reasoning and object-oriented programming paradigms in order to achieve seamless integration.This paper presents a symbiotic extension of SOUL, a system which implements a logic programming language and a production system in Smalltalk. The presence of these two logic reasoning systems in SOUL ensures a comprehensive coverage of rule-based reasoning styles, more specifically forward and backward chaining. Our approach is evaluated by means of two case studies. We summarise a comprehensive survey, which shows that existing systems do not fully support seamless integration.