Introduction To analyze the efficacy of biosimilar ranibizumab compared to innovator ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients treated with biosimilar ranibizumab for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and macular edema (ME) (due to diabetes and vein occlusion) and compared them with ranibizumab- and bevacizumab-treated patients. Results Of 202 patients, 67 (33.2%) received biosimilar ranibizumab (BSR), 69 (34.2%) ranibizumab (RBZ) and 66 (32.7%) bevacizumab (BEV). All patients received three consecutive injections followed by pro re nata dosing. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 24 months. The mean numbers of injections were 6.68 for RBZ, 6.4 for BEV and 4.7 for BSR. At 3 months, nAMD ( n = 115, 56.9%) and ME ( n = 87, 43.1%) groups showed significant improvement in vision and central foveal thickness (CFT) across all three agents. After ≥ 6 months, the effects were maintained in the AMD group but not in the ME group. Maximum effect was seen at 1 month. At no point in time was a significant difference noted among the three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. No major safety concerns were noted. Conclusions Biosimilar ranibizumab is comparable to innovator ranibizumab and bevacizumab in efficacy and safety.
PurposeTo analyze the efficacy of biosimilar ranibizumab as compared to innovator ranibizumab and bevacizumab.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients treated with biosimilar ranibizumab for wet age related macular degeneration (AMD) and macular edema (ME) and compared them with ranibizumab and bevacizumab treated patients.ResultsOut of 202 patients, 67 (33.2%) received biosimilar ranibizumab (BSR), 69 (34.2%) ranibizumab (RBZ) and 66 (32.7%) bevacizumab (BEV). All patients received 3 consecutive injections followed by pro re nata dosing. The follow up ranged from 3 -24 months. The mean number of injections were 6.68 RBZ, 6.4 BEV and 4.7 BSR. At 3 months, nAMD (n=115, 56.9%) and ME (n= 87, 43.1%) groups showed significant improvement in vision and central foveal thickness (CFT) across all 3 agents. After ≥ 6 months, the effects were maintained in AMD group but not in ME group. Maximum effect was seen at 1 month. At no point of time, significant difference was noted among the 3 anti VEGF agents. No major safety concerns were noted.ConclusionsBiosimilar ranibizumab is comparable to innovator ranibizumab and bevacizumab in efficacy and safety. It can be added to the list of available anti VEGF agents for the treatment of vascular disorders.
Purpose To determine the functional and anatomical outcomes of patients with endophthalmitis with concurrent or delayed onset retinal detachment (RD), and compare the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative features. Patients and Methods This was a retrospective review of 121 eyes in 121 patients presenting with endophthalmitis and RD. Subjects were categorized into two groups: endophthalmitis with delayed onset RD (group 1, N=76) and endophthalmitis with concurrent RD (group 2, N=45). Results The mean age of patients in groups 1 and 2 was 38.21±21.60 and 46.78±24.42 years, respectively ( P =0.047). Exogenous endophthalmitis was common in both groups 1 and 2 (86.84% and 84.44%, respectively). No significant differences were found between the groups in the type of RD, retinal breaks, number of quadrants involved or proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade. In the overall cohort, visual acuity improved post-surgery in one-third of the patients who were in the near or total blindness category at presentation. We found good anatomical success rates of an attached retina in both groups 1 and 2 (84.3% and 77.7%, P =0.376). Conclusion Our study presents the results of patients with endophthalmitis and delayed onset RD or concurrent RD. It shows a few differences in presentation between the groups, but the anatomical and functional outcomes were almost the same.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.