Purpose To summarise what is currently known about the psychosocial morbidity, experiences, and needs of people with cancer and their informal caregivers, who live in rural or regional areas of developed countries. Methods Eligible studies dating from August 2010 until May 2021 were identified through several online databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and RURAL (Rural and Remote Health Database). Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020171764). Results Sixty-five studies were included in this review, including 20 qualitative studies, 41 quantitative studies, and 4 mixed methods studies. Qualitative research demonstrated that many unique psychosocial needs of rural people remain unmet, particularly relating to finances, travel, and accessing care. However, most (9/19) quantitative studies that compared rural and urban groups reported no significant differences in psychosocial needs, morbidity, or quality of life (QOL). Five quantitative studies reported poorer psychosocial outcomes (social and emotional functioning) in urban cancer survivors, while three highlighted poorer outcomes (physical functioning, role functioning, and self-reported mental health outcomes) in the rural group. Conclusion Recent research shows that rural people affected by cancer have unique unmet psychosocial needs relating to rurality. However, there was little evidence that rural cancer survivors report greater unmet needs than their urban counterparts. This contrasts to the findings from a 2011 systematic review that found rural survivors consistently reported worse psychosocial outcomes. More population-based research is needed to establish whether uniquely rural unmet needs are due to general or cancer-specific factors.

Purpose To explore the experiences of people caring for someone with cancer, while living in rural Australia, and the impact of the cancer-caring role on their well-being. Method Eighteen adults in regional or remote (‘rural’) Australia who cared for a person with cancer took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. Participants were aged 32–77 years and mainly female (66%). Data were analysed using thematic analysis and an essentialist approach. Results Eight themes were identified: (1) travel is hard, but supports are available; (2) frustration with systems that do not demonstrate understanding of the rural context; (3) the importance of lay and peer support; (4) the impact of access to trusted, local health care services; (5) the importance of access to rurally relevant information (particularly on relevant services and what to expect); (6) living with uncertainty and balancing loss with hope; (7) reluctance to seek or accept psychological support; and (8) the gendered nature of care. Conclusion Rural cancer carers’ roles can be made easier by improving health systems and coordination to ease the burden of travel, providing information about available support and what to expect throughout cancer treatment that is relevant to the rural context, and increasing access to quality health, community, and support services, including palliative care, in rural areas. More training on the specific needs of rural patients and their carers is needed for urban health care professionals. Peer support groups may have particular value for cancer carers in rural settings, where there are known to be multiple barriers to accessing professional sources of psychosocial support.

Purpose To investigate the successful strategies of health workers who support and regularly communicate with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people about cancer and its treatment. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted face-to face or via telephone and audio-recorded with twenty-three health professionals (medical and radiation oncologists, oncology nurses and Aboriginal Health Workers), 5 identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander in the Northern Territory and South Australia. When data saturation was reached, thematic analysis using a bottom up, essentialist/realist approach was used. Results Six themes emerged. (1) Create a safe environment, engender trust and build rapport. This involves considering the physical environment and allowing time in interviews to establish a relationship. (2) Employ specific communication strategies to explain cancer, treatment and its side effects through language choices and employing visual aids such as drawings, metaphors and relatable analogies. (3) Obtain support from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander staff and patient escorts who can assist in communication. ( 4) Consider culture which involves collective decision making, strong connection to country and community, with cultural obligations and a unique understanding of cancer. ( 5) Anticipate the contextual complexities of conflicts between Western medicine and Aboriginal culture, practitioner bias and difficulty maintaining contact with patients. (6) Develop personal qualities of good communicators, including being patient-centred, showing respect, patience, empathy and honesty. Conclusion These insights will help foster more positive interactions with the health system and promote optimal outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer.

e24188 Background: To enable clinicians to effectively communicate about cancer and its treatment to Aboriginal and Torres Strait (Aboriginal) people with cancer who need to make informed choices about the Western medicine offered, we sought strategies from health professionals with experience in that field. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted face-to face or via telephone with the experienced health professionals and audio-recorded. Thematic analysis using a bottom up, essentialist/realist approach was employed to analyse the data, when data saturation was reached. Results: The 23 health professionals interviewed were medical and radiation oncologists, oncology nurses and Aboriginal health workers. Twelve were female, 11 were male with 5 identifying as Aboriginal. Six themes emerged. (1) Create a safe environment, engender trust and build rapport. This involves avoiding assumptions, allowing time, considering the physical environment, asking about home and family, being aware of gender issues and noting non-verbals. (2) Employ specific strategies to explain cancer, treatment and its side effects by using simple language, employing visual aids such as drawings, metaphors and relatable analogies such as trees with roots, weeds, abandoned rusty cars and blocked pipes. Use repetition and ensure alignment with patient needs. Warning about upcoming sensitive issues minimised the chance of disengagement. (3) Obtain support from those who can assist in communication. This includes interpreters, aboriginal liaison officers and health workers, and patient escorts. (4) Consider the culture which involves collective decision-making, strong connection to country and community, with cultural obligations and unique understanding of cancer which can involve curses, shame and utilise bush medicine. (5) Develop personal qualities of good communicators, including showing respect, patience, empathy, honesty, being person centred and embracing personal reflection. (6) Understand the contextual complexity of multiple languages, possible disengagement with treatment, difficulty maintaining contact with patients, conflicts between Western medicine and Aboriginal culture and late stage presentations. Be aware of practitioner bias. Conclusions: These insights will help foster more positive interactions with the health system and promote optimal outcomes for Aboriginal people with cancer and enable the creation of educational modules for inexperienced clinicians.