The aim of this study was to separate bottom-up and top-down influences within cerebral asymmetries. This was studied in the lateralized visual system of pigeons by recording from single units of the left and right diencephalic nucleus rotundus of the tectofugal pathway while visually stimulating the ipsilateral and/or contralateral eye. Analyses of response latencies revealed rotundal neurons with short and/or late response components. Cells with short latencies very likely represent bottom-up neurons participating in the ascending retinotectorotundal system. Because lidocaine injections into the visual Wulst produced a significant reduction of late response components only, neurons with long latencies were probably activated via a top-down telencephalotectorotundal system. The distribution and response characteristics of bottom-up and top-down neurons provided insight into several asymmetries of ascending and descending pathways. Asymmetries of the ascending retinotectorotundal system (bottom-up) were characterized by longer periods of tonic activation in the left and shorter response latencies in the right rotundus. Left-right differences in these responses probably facilitate faster access to visual input to the right hemisphere and a prolonged processing of this input in the left. The descending telencephalotectorotundal system (top-down) revealed a completely different lateralized organization. This system was characterized by long latency responses that exclusively derived from the left hemisphere, regardless of whether recordings took place in the left or the right rotundus. We assume that asymmetrical modes of visual processing within both hemispheres of the ascending tectofugal system are ultimately directed to left hemispheric forebrain mechanisms that subsequently generate executive control over sensory and motor structures.

The nucleus ventrolateralis thalami (VLT) in pigeons receives direct retinal and forebrain projections and has reciprocal connections with the optic tectum. Although VLT is a component of the avian visual system, no study directly examined its connections or its cellular response characteristics. We, therefore, recorded from single units in the pigeon's VLT while visually stimulating the ipsi-and/or contralateral eye. In addition, tracing experiments were conducted to investigate its afferent connections. Electrophysiologically, we discovered three types of neurons, two of which were probably activated via a top-down telencephalotectal system (latencies > 100 ms). Type I neurons responded to uni-and bilateral and type II neurons exclusively to bilateral stimulation. Type III neurons were probably activated by retinal or retinotectal input (latencies < 27 ms) and responded to contra-and bilateral stimulation. Retrograde tracer injections into the VLT revealed an ipsilateral forebrain input from the visual Wulst, from subregions of the arcopallium, and bilateral afferents from the optic tectum. Most intriguing was the direct connection between the VLTs of both hemispheres. We suggest that the avian VLT is part of a system that integrates visuomotor processes which are controlled by both forebrain hemispheres and that VLT contributes to descending tectomotor mechanisms.

A superposition masking and summation to threshold paradigm was employed before and after unmasked Vernier acuity training to measure sensory changes of offset analysing mechanisms. Masking functions show a uniform downward translation after training and detection data reveal higher sensitivities to compound Gabor gratings in the post-test. These findings confirm the existence of learning related changes at early levels of information processing, but the results cannot be explained by neural fine tuning of offset analysing mechanisms. The data are consistent with the idea of task dependent broadening of orientation tuned mechanisms responsible for detecting small Vernier offsets.

No abstract

Orientation masking induces changes of discrimination thresholds and perceived orientation. Studies on alignment discrimination of Vernier stimuli concentrated on masking induced changes of discrimination thresholds, without considering possible changes of perceived orientation and/or alignment of the two-line segments. Measuring both parameters in an orientation discrimination task, we confirmed a standard repulsion effect between a single line target and a mask grating that co-varied with elevated orientation discrimination thresholds. Masking a Vernier stimulus in an alignment discrimination task, we observed a strong misperception of alignment that was accompanied with elevated alignment discrimination thresholds. Orientation masking on perceived orientation and alignment of a Vernier stimulus revealed orientation repulsion and attraction that depended on the spatio-orientation configuration of the superimposed stimuli. Control of task-dependent effects confirmed that our observed pattern of results was independent of attentional or cognitive demands.