Background Spinal cord injury affects walking balance control, which necessitates methods to quantify balance ability. The purposes of this study were to 1) examine walking balance through foot placement variability post-injury; 2) assess the relationship between measures of variability and clinical balance assessments; and 3) determine if spatial parameter variability might be used as a clinical correlate for more complex balance measurements. Methods Ten persons with spinal cord injury walked without devices on a split-belt treadmill at self-selected speeds. Ten healthy controls walked at 0.3 and 0.6 m/s for comparison. Variability of step width and length, anteroposterior and mediolateral foot placements relative to center-of-mass, and margin-of-stability were calculated. Clinical assessments included Berg Balance Scale and Dynamic Gait Index. Findings Participants with spinal cord injury demonstrated significantly different variability in all biomechanical measures compared to controls (P≤0.007). Berg Balance Scale scores were significantly inversely associated with step length as well as anteroposterior and mediolateral foot placement variability (P≤0.05). Dynamic Gait Index scores were significantly inversely associated with mediolateral foot placement variability (P≤0.05). Participants with spinal cord injury showed significant correlations between spatial parameter variability and all other measures (P≤0.005), except between step length and margin-of-stability (P=0.068); controls revealed fewer correlations. Interpretation Persons post-spinal cord injury exhibit an abnormal amount of stepping variability when challenged to walk without devices, yet preserve the ability to avoid falling. When complex laboratory measures of variability are unavailable clinically, spatial parameter variability or standardized balance assessments may be plausible indicators of walking balance control.

Persons who have disorders of consciousness (DoC) require care from multidisciplinary teams with specialized training and expertise in management of the complex needs of this clinical population. The recent promulgation of practice guidelines for patients with prolonged DoC by the American Academy of Neurology, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM), and National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) represents a major advance in the development of care standards in this area of brain injury rehabilitation. Implementation of these practice guidelines requires explication of the minimum competencies of clinical programs providing services to persons who have DoC. The Brain Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the ACRM, in collaboration with the Disorders of Consciousness Special Interest Group of the NIDILRR-Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to address this need through the present position statement. Content area-specific workgroups reviewed relevant peer-reviewed literature and drafted recommendations which were then evaluated by the expert panel using a modified Delphi voting process. The process yielded 21 recommendations on the structure and process of essential services required for effective DoC-focused rehabilitation, organized into 4 categories: diagnostic and prognostic assessment (4 recommendations), treatment (11 recommendations), transitioning care/long-term care needs (5 recommendations), and management of ethical issues (1 recommendation). With few exceptions, these recommendations focus on infrastructure requirements and operating procedures for the provision of DoC-focused neurorehabilitation services across subacute and postacute settings.