Objectives: We aimed to identify factors present at the start of an initial course of systemic dexamethasone that would be associated with successful extubation in mechanically ventilated neonates <30 weeks gestational age (GA) with or at risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).Methods: We studied a retrospective cohort of neonates (23 +0 −29 +6 weeks GA), with or at risk of developing BPD, prescribed their first course of systemic dexamethasone to aid in extubation from mechanical ventilation. The data collected only pertained to the first course of dexamethasone. Neonates given dexamethasone for airway edema were not included. The primary outcome of interest was successful extubation (i.e., extubated within 14 days of starting dexamethasone and remaining extubated for at least 7 days). Binary logistic regression was employed.Results: A total of 287 neonates were included. Each additional week of GA at birth led to a 1.53 increase in the odds of successful extubation (95% CI: 1.122-2.096, p < 0.01). Higher average fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) requirements in the preceding 24 h resulted in a 0.94 decrease in the odds of successful extubation (p < 0.05) and higher mean airway pressure (MAP) resulted in 0.76 decrease in odds of successful extubation (p < 0.01).Conclusions: Mechanically ventilated neonates with or at risk of developing BPD, born at <30 week GA and initiated on dexamethasone to facilitate extubation, had a lower likelihood of successful extubation by Day 14 if they had younger GA at birth, and at the time of commencing steroids had higher MAPs and had higher oxygen requirements.

Background and ObjectiveGentamicin is commonly used in neonates, and it requires drug concentration monitoring. The objective of this study was to determine the extent of high trough (≥ 2 mg/l) and therapeutic peak serum gentamicin concentrations (5-12 mg/l) using our current gentamicin regimen and to adjust the dosing regimen accordingly and reassess. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of neonates, with normal renal function, who were prescribed gentamicin. Group 1: March 2014-July 2017-gentamicin intravenous (IV) 2.5 mg/kg given every 36 h if < 30 weeks gestational age (GA) and every 24 h if ≥ 30 weeks GA; Group 2: August 2019-February 2020-gentamicin IV 3.5 mg/kg given every 36 h if < 30 weeks GA and every 24 h if ≥ 30 weeks GA. We assessed the number of neonates with aberrant trough and peak serum gentamicin concentrations. Results Forty-eight neonates < 30 weeks GA and 34 ≥ 30 weeks GA were given 2.5 mg/kg gentamicin. Eleven (23%) neonates < 30 weeks GA and four (13%) ≥ 30 weeks GA had subtherapeutic peak concentrations (< 5 mg/l); none had supratherapeutic (> 12 mg/l) or toxic trough concentrations (≥ 2 mg/l). Forty-four neonates < 30 weeks GA and 54 ≥ 30 weeks GA were given 3.5 mg/kg gentamicin. Eighty-four (86%) had non-toxic trough concentrations (< 2 mg/l). One (1%) < 30 weeks GA neonate had subtherapeutic (< 5 mg/l) and one (1%) neonate ≥ 30 weeks GA had supratherapeutic (> 12 mg/l) peak concentrations. Conclusions Gentamicin regimen of 2.5 mg/kg given every 36 h for neonates < 30 weeks GA and every 24 h for neonates ≥ 30 weeks GA was suboptimal at achieving therapeutic gentamicin peak. Increasing the dosage to 3.5 mg/kg achieved therapeutic peak concentrations in 98% and non-toxic trough concentrations in 86% of all neonates (prior to dose interval adjustment).

There are two recently completed large randomized clinical trials of blood transfusions in the preterm infants most at risk of requiring them. Liberal and restrictive strategies were compared with composite primary outcome measures of death and neurodevelopmental impairment. Infants managed under restrictive guidelines fared no worse in regard to mortality and neurodevelopment in early life. The studies had remarkably similar demographics and used similar transfusion guidelines. In both, there were fewer transfusions in the restrictive arm. Nevertheless, there were large differences between the studies in regard to transfusion exposure with almost 3 times the number of transfusions per participant in the transfusion of prematures (TOP) study. Associated with this, there were differences between the studies in various outcomes. For example, the combined primary outcome of death or neurodevelopmental impairment was more likely to occur in the TOP study and the mortality rate itself was considerably higher. Whilst the reasons for these differences are likely multifactorial, it does raise the question as to whether they could be related to the transfusions themselves? Clearly, every effort should be made to reduce exposure to transfusions and this was more successful in the Effects of Transfusion Thresholds on Neurocognitive Outcomes (ETTNO) study. In this review, we look at factors which may explain these transfusion differences and the differences in outcomes, in particular neurodevelopment at age 2 years. In choosing which guidelines to follow, centers using liberal guidelines should be encouraged to adopt more restrictive ones. However, should centers with more restrictive guidelines change to ones similar to those in the studies? The evidence for this is less compelling, particularly given the wide range of transfusion exposure between studies. Individual centers already using restrictive guidelines should assess the validity of the findings in light of their own transfusion experience. In addition, it should be remembered that the study guidelines were pragmatic and acceptable to a large number of centers. The major focus in these guidelines was on hemoglobin levels which do not necessarily reflect tissue oxygenation. Other factors such as the level of erythropoiesis should also be taken into account before deciding whether to transfuse.