INTRODUCTION: On space missions one must consider the operating cost of the medical system on crew time. Medical Officer Occupied Time (MOOT) may vary significantly depending on provider skill. This pilot study assessed the MOOT Skill Effect (MOOTSkE).METHODS: An expert surgeon (ES), fifth year surgical resident (PGY5), second year surgical resident (PGY2), and an expert Emergency Physician (EP) with only 4 mo direct surgical training each performed two simulated appendectomies. The completion times for endotracheal intubation, appendectomy, and two subprocedures (multilayer tissue repair and single layer tissue repair) were recorded.RESULTS: The ES performed the appendectomy in 410 s, the PGY-5 in 498 s, the PGY-2 in 645 s, and the EP in 973 s on average. The PGY-2 and EP time difference was significant compared to the expert. The PGY-5 was not. The EP’s time was significantly longer for the appendectomy and the multilayer repair than either surgical resident. For the single layer repair, only the EP-ES difference was significant. A single intubation attempt by the PGY-2 took 73 s while the EP averaged 27 s. The average recorded MOOTSkE between novice and expert was 2.5 (SD 0.34).DISCUSSION: This pilot study demonstrates MOOTSkE can be captured using simulated procedures. It showed the magnitude of the MOOTSkE is likely substantial, suggesting that a more highly trained provider may save substantial crew time. Limitations included small sample size, limited number of procedures, a simulation that may not reflect real world conditions, and suboptimal camera angles.Levin DR, Siu M, Kramer K, Kelly E, Alouidor R, Fernandez G, Kamine T. Time cost of provider skill: a pilot study of medical officer occupied time by knowledge, skill, and ability level. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2022; 93(11):816–821.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Many trauma patients currently transferred from rural and community hospitals (RCH) to Level I trauma centers (LITC) for trauma surgery evaluation may instead be appropriate for immediate discharge or admission to the local facility after evaluation by a trauma and acute care surgery (TACS) surgeon. Unnecessary use of resources occurs with current practice. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptance of a teletrauma surgery consultation service between LITC and RCH. STUDY DESIGN: LITC TACS surgeons provided telehealth consults on trauma patients from 3 local RCHs. After consultation, appropriate patients were transferred to LITC; selected patients remained at or were discharged from RCH. Participating TACS surgeons and RCH physicians were surveyed. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients met inclusion criteria during the 5-month pilot phase, with 7 excluded due to workflow issues. The mean ± SD age was 63 ± 17 years. Of 21 patients, 7 had intracranial hemorrhage; 12 had rib fractures. The mean ± SD Injury Severity Score was 8.1 ± 4.0). A total of 6 patients were discharged from RCH, 4 admitted to RCH hospitalist service, 2 transferred to a LITC emergency room, and 9 transferred to LITC as direct admission. There was one 30-day readmission and no missed injuries or complications, or deaths. RCH providers were highly satisfied with the teletrauma surgery consultation service, TACS surgeons, and equipment used. Mental demand and effort of consulting TACS surgeons decreased significantly as the consult number increased. CONCLUSIONS: Teletrauma surgery consultation involving 3 RCH within our system is feasible and acceptable. A total of 10 transfers and 19 emergency department visits were avoided. There was favorable acceptance by RCH providers and TACS surgeons.