Large inter-patient variability in wear rate and wear direction have been a ubiquitous attribute of total hip arthroplasty (THA) cohorts. Since patients at the high end of the wear spectrum are of particular concern for osteolysis and loosening, it is important to understand why some individuals experience wear at a rate far in excess of their cohort average. An established computational model of polyethylene wear was used to test the hypothesis that, other factors being equal, clinically typical variability in regions of localized femoral head roughening could account for much of the variability observed clinically in both wear magnitude and wear direction. The model implemented the Archard abrasive/adhesive wear relationship, which incorporates contact stress, sliding distance, and (implicitly) bearing surface tribology. Systematic trials were conducted to explore the influences of head roughening severity, roughened area size, and roughened area location. The results showed that, given the postulated wear factor elevations, head roughening variability (conservatively) typical of retrieval specimens led to approximately a 30 degrees variation in wear direction, and approximately a 7-fold variation in volumetric wear rate. Since these data show that randomness in head scratching can account for otherwise-difficult-to-explain variations in wear direction and wear rate, third-body debris may be a key factor causing excessive wear in the most problematic subset of the THA population.
Wear rate and wear direction vary considerably within total hip arthroplasty (THA) patient cohorts. Third body effects and wide-ranging differences in patient activity levels are two factors suspected of contributing to wear variability. A sliding-distance-coupled contact finite element formulation was used to test the hypothesis that nonidentical duty cycles (differing activities, or change of third body challenge) produce accelerations in polyethylene wear. Effects of nonidentical duty cycles, time-variant femoral head roughening, and outlier gait inputs were investigated. Without femoral head roughening, combination walk/stair-climb wear simulations did not result in appreciably higher volumetric wear than a walk-only simulation, but when a roughened zone was included, walk/stair-climb volumetric wear increased by approximately 57% above that of a similarly roughened walk-only simulation. To investigate time-variant femoral head roughening, wear simulations were begun with femoral head roughening at one location on the femoral head, switching to another location halfway through the simulation. Results varied depending on roughening sites, but cases of substantial increase in wear involved a transient jump in wear rate shortly after the change of head roughening location. Outlier duty cycles were simulated by increasing or decreasing the joint contact force and range of motion inputs, to levels at the 97.5th and 2.5th percentiles of a population of normal subjects. The resulting wear showed an increase or decrease closely proportional to the percentage by which each input (force or range of motion) was changed. ß
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.