Further research is required to provide a standard for the screening and assessment of parents' mental health and psychosocial well-being during a NICU hospitalization. The experiences of nonbirth parents in the NICU should be explored to examine the effects of the hospitalization on all types of parents.

Having a child hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a deviation from the norms expected for pregnancy and childbirth. A NICU admission may be traumatic for some parents, causing psychological distress and altered parenting roles. The aim of this integrative review is to examine the experiences and perceptions of a NICU hospitalization from the perspective of both parents to inform clinical practice and future research. A systematic search of 3 databases was conducted and included studies were evaluated by the Critical Skills Appraisal Programme checklist for qualitative studies. The Whittemore and Knafl integrative review methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis methodology were followed to provide a structure for searching and reporting findings. There were 248 participants (153 mothers and 95 fathers) from 9 countries and of varying socioeconomic backgrounds in the 16 primary qualitative studies included in this review. The resulting major themes included panic sequence, emotional upheaval, social support, faith, and adjusting. Interventions directed at managing parents' emotions, supporting their spiritual needs, facilitating parenting skills and infant attachment, and adapting the environment to parents' needs can help improve the NICU experience.

Rapid response teams are used to improve the recognition of acute deteriorations in medical and surgical settings. They are activated by abnormal physiological parameters, symptoms or clinical concern, and are believed to decrease hospital mortality rates. We evaluated the reasons for activation and the outcome of rapid response interventions in a 222-bed psychiatric hospital in New York City using data obtained at the time of all activations from January through November, 2012. The primary outcome was the admission rate to a medical or surgical unit for each of the main reasons for activation. The 169 activations were initiated by nursing staff (78.7 %) and psychiatrists (13 %) for acute changes in condition (64.5 %), abnormal physiological parameters (27.2 %) and non-specified concern (8.3 %). The most common reasons for activation were chest pain (14.2 %), fluctuating level of consciousness (9.5 %), hypertension (9.5 %), syncope or fall (8.9 %), hypotension (8.3 %), dyspnea (7.7 %) and seizures (5.9 %). The rapid response team transferred 127 (75.2 %) patients to the Emergency Department and 46 (27.2 %) were admitted to a medical or surgical unit. The admission rates were statistically similar for acute changes in condition, abnormal physiological parameters, and clinicians' concern. In conclusion, a majority of rapid response activations in a self-standing psychiatric hospital were initiated by nursing staff for changes in condition, rather than for policy-specified abnormal physiological parameters. The findings suggest that a rapid response system may empower psychiatric nurses to use their clinical skills to identify patients requiring urgent transfer to a general hospital.