Perceived drinking norms have received increased attention as one determinant of high levels of college alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems. Excessive drinking is widely visible on college campuses, and students may therefore assume that it is peer-supported (Kitts, 2003). Research into peer relations indicates that the perceived approval of important others predicts drinking behavior . Neither the use of alcohol-related protective behavioral strategies nor alcohol-related negative consequences have been investigated in terms of their perceived approval. The purpose of this study was to extend previous research on injunctive norms and assess self-other discrepancies in levels of approval for campus drinking patterns, negative alcohol-related consequences, and protective behavioral strategies. Undergraduate volunteers (n = 324, 61% female, 67% Caucasian) completed an online survey of drinking patterns; they rated comfort with overall campus drinking, and the acceptability of alcohol-related consequences and protective strategies for themselves and their close friends. As predicted, students expressed lower acceptance of consequences than their friends, and higher acceptance of alcohol-related protective strategies. We observed main effects of gender and year in school. Males and upperclassmen expressed higher acceptance of negative consequences for both self and others, and lower acceptance of protective strategies for both self and others. Implications for prevention programs are discussed.Keywords injunctive norms; college drinking; gender; alcohol abuse prevention High rates of college student alcohol use continue to cause public health concern (Hingson et al., 2009). At least two out of five college students report engaging in heavy episodic (binge) drinking, defined as consuming four or more drinks in a drinking episode for a Please Address Correspondence To: Kate B. Carey, Ph.D. Department of Psychology, Center for Health and Behavior, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244-2340, kbcarey@syr.edu, Phone: 315-443-2706. Statement 2: Contributors All authors of this paper have contributed to the conceptualization, implementation, and writing of this manuscript. All authors approved of the current draft and agree to the submission. Statement 3: Conflict of InterestNone of the authors of this paper have any interests that may be interpreted as influencing the research.Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. female and five or more drinks in a drinking episode for a male, at least once every two weeks (O'Malley & Johnston, ...

Background: Successful implementation of group-based appointments can increase capacity to treat patients, reduce costs, and improve productivity. We sought to understand the acceptability of group-based appointments for opioid use disorder (OUD) in an urban clinical setting that treats predominantly ethnic minority populations. Methods: A survey collecting data on demographics, substance use, co-morbid psychiatric conditions, and satisfaction with group-based opioid treatment (GBOT) was conducted among patients 18 years and older with OUD attending an urban buprenorphine clinic between December 2019 and February 2020. Results: Thirty-nine patient surveys were completed. Among participants, 64.1% identified as Black/African American and 76.9% identified as male. The mean age was 51.2 years. Participants reported overall high levels of satisfaction with group-based appointments though GBOT was not strongly preferred over individual visits. On a 5-point Likert scale, 69.2% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that their medical needs were met during group-based appointments. A majority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that medical information received from the clinical team (97.4%) and other patients (82.1%) were valuable. Most participants (82.1%) reported adherence to treatment plans became easier since attending GBOT. Age and self-identified employment status as disabled or retired were positively associated with total satisfaction scores. Conclusions: Patients in a predominantly Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx community with co-occurring mental health disorders and other substance use reported overall satisfaction with GBOT and would recommend this modality to other patients.