Earlier studies suggested more severe overall cognitive impairments in deficit versus non-deficit schizophrenia; however, the specific contribution of different cognitive domains to this overall cognitive impairment remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the two subtypes in general cognitive functioning as well as in individual cognitive domains using the composite score approach. One hundred and forty-three patients fulfilling the criteria for the deficit syndrome were compared with 123 patients diagnosed with non-deficit schizophrenia. Neurocognitive functioning was assessed by a neuropsychological test battery measuring the domains of sustained vigilance/attention, working memory, short-term memory, verbal memory, cognitive flexibility, and ideation fluency. Using the raw neuropsychological measures, we calculated a global index of cognitive impairment and domain-specific composite z-scores. Association between these composite scores and the deficit syndrome was examined by logistic regression analysis. After adjusting for relevant covariates including sex, age, education, smoking, and antipsychotic dose, results indicated a significant increase in the likelihood of deficit syndrome as a function of global (OR = 5.40; 95% CI 3.02-9.65) as well as domain-specific impairments (OR > 2 for all individual domains except for short-term memory). Cognitive flexibility was an independent predictor (OR = 2.92; 95% CI 1.47-5.80), whereas other cognitive domains demonstrated no unique contribution to the general cognitive impairment. Patients with deficit schizophrenia suffer from a more severe degree of neurocognitive impairment, which is qualitatively similar to the dysfunction seen in non-deficit schizophrenia. However, our results indicate that cognitive flexibility is specifically impaired in deficit versus non-deficit patients and may therefore represent a core feature of this subtype.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.