The Adolescent Growth Spurt (AGS) was studied in rural Hyderabad boys of 5+ years of age with known childhood nutritional background. Longitudinal data on height measurements of pre-school children available for 13 to 16 points of follow-up, during an 18 year period of study (i.e., from 1965-66 to 1983-84) were utilized for this purpose. A Preece and Baines model 1 (PB 1) function was fitted for height measurements of 323 boys aged 19-24 years in 1984. The boys were classified into three groups according to degree of under-nutrition at the age of 5+ years, using Boston reference values for height. Boys with severe height deficit at age 5+ were considered to have had a background of severe undernutrition and were referred as Group III. Boys with normal range height measurements at age 5+ were considered to have a normal nutritional background and were referred to as Group I. Group II boys had height deficits in between the above two groups and were considered to have milk to moderate undernutrition backgrounds. Group I boys had similar timing, intensity, duration of Adolescent Growth Spurt Period (AGSP) and gained a similar amount of height during puberty as did British boys. Group III boys differed significantly from British boys for AGS. They entered late into puberty, with significantly depressed intensity, but gained a similar amount of height, as a result of prolonged AGSP, which continued till 19.2 years. Thus a childhood background of undernutrition did not lead to any additional deficit in height during puberty. However, pre-pubertal height deficits were carried into adult height. The growth curves of rural Hyderabad children were parallel to the British distance height curve after 12 years of age. The mean constant height velocity curve of group I boys was superimposable on the British curve during puberty.

No abstract

About 50% of students study in private schools but private school teachers’ has been subject to exploitation for a long time. The difference in terms of contractual employment of teachers in government and private schools are explained using a review of the available literature. Improper dismissal, unfair contract terms, inadequate and irregular payment of salaries are identified as the major problems faced by private school teachers. This article analyses the lacunae in current state laws regulating private schools in Tamil Nadu. The terms of employment of teachers in government and private schools are compared using secondary data derived from reliable sources. Teachers are forced to strike and engage in public agitations to assert their rights as otherwise they are burdened by long litigations in courts. Judiciary’s approach towards private educational institutions is traced through various decisions of the Supreme Court and high courts. The amenability of private schools to writ jurisdiction is also analysed. Some recommendations are made to improve the labour conditions and grievance redressal of private schools teacher in Tamil Nadu

No abstract