Objectives: There are multiple guidelines for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) by various dermatological associations, but in real-world practice in India, different approaches have been noted. In this paper, we courted to determine these different approaches in CSU management, adherence to various CSU guidelines, and the reasons for deviation from guidelines amidst dermatologists in India. Materials and Methods: A net-based questionnaire was created and validated by five panelists experienced in CSU management and then was circulated to all dermatologists in India in August 2020 for real-world management scenario. Results: We received 880 completed response out of 2235 response. Most of the dermatologists (97%) were aware of some urticaria guidelines. Although many of them follow guidelines about three forth of them reported to deviate from it sometimes. The most common reason for deviation was rely on clinical experience as opted by 53% of respondents. Dermatologists who follow guidelines also investigate routinely in terms of complete blood count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and thyroid-stimulating hormone as compared to those who do not. About 70.5% of the dermatologist prescribe second-generation antihistamine (SGAH) at approved dose as the first line of treatment whereas 63.6% up dose it as second line of treatment. Surprisingly, 68% prescribe first-generation antihistamine in the evening and SGAH in the morning as combination therapy in CSU. Conclusion: From the findings of the present study, it can be strongly implied that guidelines play a vital role in delivering superior attributes of patient care although 75% of dermatologists deviated from it. Main reasons for deviance are reliability on self-clinical proficiency and consideration of economic impediments. Both these factors need to be worked upon by continuous medical education of dermatologists and more pharmaco-economic research.

<p class="abstract">Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) is a multifactorial disorder linked to alterations in melanin pigment because of inflammatory skin condition or any injury. Acne-induced PIH is one of the common presentations observed in dermatological consultations in India, especially in females of younger age group. A wide range of topical depigmenting agents are available for effective clearance of hyperpigmentation in patients affected with acne. Besides, chemical peels and cosmetic procedures like lasers and light therapies are commonly employed. However, treatment of acne-induced PIH is challenging in Indian clinical settings for multiple reasons such as relapsing of the condition and long-standing nature of the disease; the tendency of treatment to cause pigmentation; insufficient clinical data on natural ingredients; and lack of clinical practice guidelines, exclusively for the management of PIH in Indian patients. An experts’ panel discussion involving dermatologists all over India was conducted to review the evidence-based concept of acne-induced hyperpigmentation, and to obtain expert opinions on effective and practical management of acne-induced PIH in Indian settings. This article outlines consensus expert opinions aimed at identifying, diagnosing, and managing acne-induced PIH using topical depigmenting agents in Indian patients. It also highlights effective preventive strategies, the role of patient counselling and education regarding awareness about the disease and its treatment strategies.  </p>