Purpose Otorhinolaryngological manifestations are common symptoms of COVID-19. This study provides a brief and precise review of the current knowledge regarding COVID-19, including disease transmission, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and potential treatment. The article focused on COVID-19-related information useful in otolaryngologist practice. Methods The Medline and Web of Science databases were searched without a time limit using terms “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2” in conjunction with “otorhinolaryngological manifestation”, “ENT”, and “olfaction”. Results The most common otolaryngological dysfunctions of COVID-19 were cough, sore throat, and dyspnea. Rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and dizziness were also present. COVID-19 could manifest as an isolated sudden hyposmia/anosmia. Upper respiratory tract (URT) symptoms were commonly observed in younger patients and usually appeared initially. They could be present even before the molecular confirmation of SARS-CoV-2. Otolaryngologists are of great risk of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 as they cope with URT. ENT surgeons could be easily infected by SARS-CoV-2 during performing surgery in COVID-19 patients. Conclusion Ear, nose and throat (ENT) symptoms may precede the development of severe COVID-19. During COVID-19 pandemic, patients with cough, sore throat, dyspnea, hyposmia/anosmia and a history of travel to the region with confirmed COVID-19 patients, should be considered as potential COVID-19 cases. An otolaryngologist should wear FFP3/N95 mask, glasses, disposable and fluid resistant gloves and gown while examining such individuals. Not urgent ENT surgeries should be postponed. Additional studies analyzing why some patients develop ENT symptoms during COVID-19 and others do not are needed. Further research is needed to determine the mechanism leading to anosmia.

Otolaryngologists are at very high risk of COVID-19 infection while performing examination or surgery. Strict guidelines for these specialists have not already been provided, while currently available recommendations could presumably change in course of COVID-19 pandemic as the new data increases. Objectives: This study aimed to synthesize evidence concerning otolaryngology during COVID-19 pandemic. It presents a review of currently existing guidelines and recommendations concerning otolaryngological procedures and surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic, and provides a collective summary of all crucial information for otolaryngologists. It summarizes data concerning COVID-19 transmission, diagnosis, and clinical presentation highlighting the information significant for otolaryngologists. Methods: The Medline and Web of Science databases were searched without time limit using terms ''COVID-19", "SARS-CoV-2" in conjunction with "head and neck surgery", "otorhinolaryngological manifestations". Results: Patients in stable condition should be consulted using telemedicine options. Only emergency consultations and procedures should be performed during COVID-19 pandemic. Mucosainvolving otolaryngologic procedures are considered high risk procedures and should be performed using enhanced PPE (N95 respirator and full face shield or powered air-purifying respirator, disposable gloves, surgical cap, gown, shoe covers). Urgent surgeries for which there is not enough time for SARS-CoV-2 screening are also considered high risk procedures. These operations should be performed in a negative pressure operating room with high-efficiency particulate air filtration. Less urgent cases should be tested for COVID-19 twice, 48 h preoperatively in 24 h interval. Conclusions: This review serves as a collection of current recommendations for otolaryngologists for how to deal with their patients during COVID-19 pandemic.

In chronic upper respiratory tract diseases, increased cell proliferative activity is observed, which is coordinated by BCL-2 proteins and small non-coding RNAs. This study aimed to determine the expression of critical apoptosis markers at the mRNA and miRNA levels in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CSRwNP). The study group consisted of ten patients with CSRwNP and ten healthy subjects. To detect in situ apoptosis in the maxillary sinus mucosa, TUNEL staining was performed. The expression of transcripts was determined by RT-qPCR and included the detection of markers associated with cell survival and apoptosis, i.e., BAX, p53, p21, CASP3, CASP9, c-MYC, CCND1, BRIC5, and APAF1. Levels of miR-17-5p, miR-145-5p, miR-146a-5p, and miR-203a-3p were also measured by RT-qPCR. The obtained results indicated increased apoptosis determined by a TUNEL assay in CSRwNP patients and accompanied by an increased expression of BAX, P21, P53, CASP3, CASP9, c-MYC, and APAF-1 transcripts and decreased mRNA levels of BCL-2 and BIRC5. Furthermore, the nasal sinus epithelium of patients with CSRwNP showed increased levels of miR-203a-3p while also showing a decreased expression of miR-17-5p and miR-145-5p. Our results showed that pro-apoptotic transcripts detected at mRNA and miRNA levels might be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis with polyps. The identification of those key molecular mediators may be applicable for the specific diagnostic and/or development of targeted therapies for chronic sinusitis with polyps.

Purpose Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is observed in almost 100% of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). CF-related CRS treatment is extremely challenging because of the underlying genetic defect leading to its development. CRS in CF is often refractory to standard therapy, while recurrences after surgical treatment are inevitable in the majority of patients. This study provides a precise review of the current knowledge regarding possible therapeutic options for CF-related CRS. Methods The Medline and Web of Science databases were searched without a time limit using the terms “cystic fibrosis” in conjunction with “otorhinolaryngological manifestation”, “rhinology” and “sinusitis”. Results Precise guidelines for CF-induced CRS therapy are lacking due to the lack of large cohort randomized controlled trials. None of the existing therapeutic agents has already been recommended for CRS in CF. Therapy targeting the underlying genetic defect, intranasal dornase alfa administration, and topical delivery of colistin and tobramycin showed promising results in CF-related CRS therapy. Besides the potential effectiveness of nasal steroids, strong recommendations for their usage in CF have not been provided yet. Systemic corticosteroid usage is controversial due to its potential negative influence on pulmonary disease. Ibuprofen revealed some positive effects on CF-related CRS in molecular and small cohort studies. Intranasal irrigation with saline solutions could relieve sinonasal symptoms. Nasal decongestants are not recommended. Endoscopic sinus surgery is the first-line surgical option for refractory CRS. Extensive surgical approaches should be considered as they could improve long-term outcomes in CRS. Conclusion Further studies are warranted to establish consensus for CF-related CRS therapy.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to determine and compare the range of pH value in nasal and sinus cavities in vivo regarding the presence of bacteria colonizing sinonasal mucosa among healthy subjects. Methods: The nasal pH value measurement using a portable pH meter (Dx-pH System, Restech) and the microbiological culture swab were taken from beneath the middle turbinate and in the sinus cavity in 39 healthy subjects during maxillary bone corrective osteotomy with the Le Fort I technique. Results: The mean pH value (independently of sex, P = .441) in the healthy sinus cavity was statistically higher than in the nasal middle meatus: 7.96 (SD ± 0.29) versus 7.83 (SD ± 0.30) ( P = .032). Forty-eight strains of bacteria were cultured from sinus maxillaries cavities—aerobic 36.8%, aerobic and anaerobic 52.6%, anaerobic only 10.5%—and 23 strains from the nasal meatus—aerobic 25%, aerobic and anaerobic 75%. A statistically significant correlation was found between the type and location of 8 microorganisms, especially Propionibacterium acnes, identified only in the sinus cavities. Conclusions: Differences in the pH value between the middle nasal meatus and the maxillary sinus are characteristic of healthy subjects and could be associated with the diverse bacterial flora. The role of bacteria Propionibacterium acnes seems to be crucial for the pH range and sinus flora in healthy subjects.