Context While stages of reproductive aging for women in the general population are well described by STRAW+10 criteria, this is largely unknown for female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (AYA survivors). Objective To evaluate applying STRAW+10 criteria in AYA survivors using bleeding patterns with and without endocrine biomarkers, and assess how cancer treatment gonadotoxicity is related to reproductive aging stage. Design The sample (n=338) included AYA survivors from the Window Study cohort. Menstrual bleeding data and dried blood spots for AMH and FSH measurements (Ansh DBS ELISAs) were utilized for reproductive aging stage assessment. Cancer treatment data were abstracted from medical records. Results Among participants, mean age 34.0±4.5 and at a mean of 6.9±4.6 years since cancer treatment, the most common cancers were lymphomas(31%), breast(23%), and thyroid(17%). Twenty-nine percent was unclassifiable by STRAW+10 criteria, occuring more frequently in the first 2 years from treatment . Most unclassifiable survivors exhibited bleeding patterns consistent with the menopausal transition, but had reproductive phase AMH and/or FSH levels. For classifiable survivors (48% peak reproductive, 30% late reproductive, 12% early transition, 3% late transition, 7% post-menopause), endocrine biomarkers distinguished among peak, early and late stages within the reproductive and transition phases. Gonadotoxic treatments were associated with more advanced stages. Conclusions We demonstrate a novel association between gonadotoxic treatments and advanced stages of reproductive aging. Without endocrine biomarkers, bleeding pattern alone can misclassify AYA survivors into either more or less advanced stages. Moreover, a large proportion of AYA survivors exhibited combinations of endocrine biomarkers and bleeding patterns that do not fit STRAW+10 criteria, suggesting the need for modified staging for this population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.