No abstract

Background The urticaria control test (UCT) is a questionnaire designed to determine if chronic urticaria (CU) is controlled or not and to aid therapeutic decision-making. It collects retrospective information about the symptoms and quality of life impairment over the last 4 weeks. The current study aimed to investigate the validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the Turkish version of the UCT. We also evaluated its correlation with other tools and compared the UCT results of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and patients with chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU). Methods Following forward/backward translation and cognitive debriefing, the Turkish version of the UCT was used in 81 CSU and 78 CINDU patients. Dermatology life quality index (DLQI), Chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), urticaria activity score (UAS), patients' and physicians’ global assessment visual analog scores and Likert scales were used at baseline and after four weeks to assess quality of life impairment, disease activity and disease control. Statistical analysis to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the UCT as well as comparison between CINDU and CSU patients were performed. Results Duration of disease was longer, disease control was poorer and severe complaints were more frequent in CINDU patients (duration of disease: 36.3 (24) ± 49.1 vs 31.5 (9) ± 67.9, p = .007, UCT baseline: 8.4 (8) ± 3.4 vs 10.4 (11) ± 3.9, p = .001 and patient's global assessment Likert scale severe complaints: 6 vs 15, p < .001, respectively). The UCT showed excellent internal consistency for CSU and a minimally acceptable consistency for CINDU ( Cronbach's α 0.89 for CSU versus 0.68 for CINDU). It showed strong correlation with CU-Q2oL but a moderate correlation with DLQI (r = −0.649, P < .001 and r = −0.545, P < .001, respectively). It was able to discriminate between patients with different disease control and was sensitive to detect changes in the disease control in both groups. The minimally important difference of the UCT was found to be 3. Conclusions The Turkish version of the UCT is a valid and reliable tool for the management of CU patients and can be used both in CSU and CINDU patients to determine if the treatment is sufficient and if disease activity and quality of life impairment are under control or not.

Objective: Recurrent Angioedema (RAE) is characterized by sudden swelling of mucosal surfaces or deep dermis and is either mast cell-(MMAE) or bradykinin-mediated (BMAE). How patients with BMAE and MMAE differ in terms of disease activity and impact remains largely unknown. Here, we determined validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of Turkish versions of angioedema activity score (AAS) and quality of life questionnaire (AE-QoL) and used both instruments to investigate and compare patients with BMAE and MMAE.Methods: Turkish versions of AAS28 and AE-QoL were applied to 94 patients with RAE (18-72 years). Patients' global self-assessment of QoL (PGA-QoL), disease activity (PGA-DA-VRS, PatGA-DA-VAS), and 12-Item-Short Form Survey were used at week 4 (visit 2), and week 8 (visit 3). Demographic characteristics, clinical features, and AAS28 and AE-QoL values were compared between 31 patients with BMAE and 63 patients with MMAE.Results: Turkish AAS28 and AE-QoL showed excellent internal consistency, high reproducibility and known-groups validity. Compared to patients with MMAE, BMAE patients were younger (34.6 AE 10.7 vs. 40.7 AE 13.3 years), had longer disease duration (236 AE 178 vs. 51 AE 78 months), high prevalence of family history (63% vs 14%), longer duration of attacks (65 AE 20 vs. 40 AE 25 h), and they were more commonly affected by upper airway angioedema (70% vs 23%). Disease activity (AAS28) was lower (29.3 AE 24.6 vs 55.2 AE 52.9), but AE-QoL was higher (44.2 AE 16.1 vs 34.5 AE 22.5) in BMAE patients as compared to MMAE patients.Conclusions: Patients with BMAE and MMAE have distinct disease characteristics. Recurrent bradykinin-mediated angioedema impacts quality of life more than mast cell-mediated angioedema. The discriminating characteristics of patients with BMAE and MMAE may help to improve the diagnosis and management of patients with RAE.

The recommended dose of omalizumab for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is 300 mg every 4 weeks, but there is no recommendation for patients who do not benefit from this dose. Our aim is to present the experiences on the use of doses of omalizumab higher than those recommended for CSU patients and to propose a protocol for updosing. This was a retrospective analysis of patients treated with omalizumab for CSU from 2 urticaria centers in Istanbul and Barcelona. The weekly urticaria activity score and/or the Urticaria Control Test (UCT) were used to monitor response. In Barcelona, a stepwise updosing regimen was preferred (450 mg first, then increasing to 600 mg), while in Istanbul, direct updosing to 600 mg was chosen. In Istanbul, 81 (88%) patients were treated with 300 mg, while 11 (12%) received 600 mg of omalizumab. In Barcelona, 7 (8.8%), 45 (56.3%), 17 (21.3%), and 11 (13.8%) patients received 150, 300, 450, and 600 mg of omalizumab, respectively. Urticaria control was achieved in 82.6% of the patients with 300 mg and in 8.7% of the patients with 600 mg in Istanbul, while it was achieved with 150 mg in 10%, with 300 mg in 48.8%, with 450 mg in 16.3%, and with 600 mg in 6.3% of the patients in Barcelona. In total, 123 (71.5%) patients responded to 150–300 mg and 26 (15.1%) to 450–600 mg. When responders to 150–300 mg (n = 123) were compared with responders to 450–600 mg (n = 26), BMI was found to be higher, and pre-omalizumab UCT was found to be lower in patients receiving updosed omalizumab (p = 0.029). Baseline data of the patients, especially BMI and pre-oma UCT, might be useful to determine if the patient will require higher doses of omalizumab. We recommend a stepwise approach starting from 450 mg and then updosing to 600 mg in CSU patients who do not respond or partially respond to 300 mg of omalizumab after 3–6 months of treatment.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common disease both in the pediatric and in the adult population. However, there are differences between the two patient populations with respect to etiological factors, comorbidities, and treatment responses. Our aim was to determine differences between pediatric and adult CSU in terms of clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, comorbidities, response to treatment, and indicators of response.Methods: A retrospective analysis of CSU patients was performed. Data regarding differences between pediatric and adult CSU patients were analyzed. Indicators of treatment response were determined separately in both pediatric and adult patients.Results: Of 751 CSU patients (162 pediatrics and 589 adults), female dominancy (48.8% vs. 69.6%) and rate of angioedema (19.1% vs. 59.8%) were lower, and disease duration (5 months vs. 12 months) was shorter in pediatric patients. Anti-TPO positivity (24.7% vs. 9%), elevated CRP (46.5% vs. 11.1%), eosinopenia (38.5% vs. 18.1%), and skin prick test positivity (39.3% vs. 28.8%) were significantly more frequent in adult patients. Response to antihistamines was higher in the pediatric group, and only 7% used omalizumab versus 20.8% in the adults. The comparisons were also performed between <12-year and ≥12-year patients and yielded similar results. How to cite this article: Özçeker D, Can PK, Terzi Ö, et al. Differences between adult and pediatric chronic spontaneous urticaria from a cohort of 751 patients: Clinical features, associated conditions, and indicators of treatment response.