This study assessed the risk factors driving the epidemic of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (COVID-Mucor) in Indiathat accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the second wave. We analysed the risk factors among 164 participants:132 COVID-Mucor(cases) and 32 non-COVID-Mucor(controls)using the data from a prospective cohort study of mucormycosis over oneyear. Diabetes mellitus remained a pivotal risk factor in both groups (97%) while uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (OR: 4.6; p=0.026)and newly detected diabetes (OR: 3.3; p=0.018), werecommoneramong the cases. Most patients with COVID-Mucor had mild COVID-19. Steroid use, often unwarranted, was highly associated with COVID-Mucorafter adjusting for other risk factors (OR 28.4; P 0.001). Serum ferritin was significantly higher(p=0.041), while C-reactive protein was not, suggesting that alterations in iron metabolism probably predispose to COVID-Mucor. Oxygen was used only in a small minority of patients with COVID-Mucor. The in-hospital mortality in both groups was low. In conclusion, the Indian COVID-Mucorepidemic was likely driven by a convergence of interlinked risk factors –uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, unwarranted steroid use, and perhapsCOVID-19 itself. Appropriate steroid use in patients with severe COVID-19 and screening and optimal control of hyperglycaemia can prevent COVID-Mucor.
A significant proportion of patients with Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) develop oroantral fistulas. Due to the unclear efficacy of crushed delayed-release posaconazole tablets (DRPT) via nasogastric tube in this group of patients, clinicians often use inferior alternatives like posaconazole suspension. In this prospective study, we report good plasma concentrations (median, 2,639 ng/mL; interquartile range [IQR], 1,690 to 3,575 ng/mL; and range, 1,004 to 4,835ng/mL) and complete cure and survival at 3 and 6 months in 19 such patients.
Purpose
Identifying persistent bacteremia early in patients with neutropenia may improve outcome. This study evaluated the role of follow-up blood cultures (FUBC) positivity in predicting outcomes among patients with neutropenia and carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bloodstream infections (CRGNBSI).
Methods
This retrospective cohort study conducted between December 2017 and April 2022 included patients more than 15 years old with neutropenia and CRGNBSI, who survived for ≥ 48 h, receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy and had FUBCs. Patients with polymicrobial bacteremia within 30 days were excluded. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality. Persistent bacteremia, septic shock, recovery from neutropenia, prolonged or profound neutropenia, requirement of intensive care and dialysis, and initiation of appropriate empirical therapy were also studied.
Results
In our study cohort of 155 patients, the 30 day mortality rate was 47.7%. Persistent bacteremia was common in our patient cohort (43.8%). Carbapenem resistant isolates identified in the study were K.pneumoniae (80%), E.coli (12.26%), P.aeruginosa (5.16%), A.baumanii (1.94%) and E.cloacae (0.65%). The median time for sending a FUBC was 2 days (IQR, 1–3 days). Patients with persistent bacteremia had higher mortality than those without (56.76% versus 32.1%; p < 0.001). Appropriate initial empirical therapy was given to 70.9%. Recovery from neutropenia occurred in 57.4% while 25.8% had prolonged or profound neutropenia. Sixty-nine percent (107/155) had septic shock and needed intensive care; 12.2% of patients required dialysis. Non-recovery from neutropenia (aHR, 4.28; 95% CI 2.53–7.23), presence of septic shock (aHR, 4.42; 95%CI 1.47–13.28), requirement of intensive care (aHR,3.12;95%CI 1.23–7.93), and persistent bacteremia (aHR,1.74; 95%CI 1.05–2.89) significantly predicted poor outcomes in multivariable analysis.
Conclusion
FUBC showing persistent bacteremia predicted poor outcomes among neutropenic patients with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bloodstream infections (CRGNBSI) and should be routinely reported.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.