G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) signal primarily through G proteins or arrestins. Arrestin binding to GPCRs blocks G protein interaction and redirects signaling to numerous G proteinindependent pathways. Here we report the crystal structure of a constitutively active form of human rhodopsin bound to a pre-activated form of the mouse visual arrestin, determined by serial femtosecond X-ray laser crystallography. Together with extensive biochemical and mutagenesis data, the structure reveals an overall architecture of the rhodopsin-arrestin assembly, in which rhodopsin uses distinct structural elements, including TM7 and Helix 8 to recruit arrestin. Correspondingly, arrestin adopts the pre-activated conformation, with a ~20° rotation between the Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms § Correspondence to H. Eric Xu: Eric.Xu@vai.org. * These authors contributed equally.Contributions: Y.K. initiated the project, developed the expression and purification methods for rhodopsin-arrestin complex, and bulk-purified expression constructs and proteins used in LCP crystallization for the SFX method; X.E.Z. collected the synchrotron data, helped with the SFX data collection, processed the data, and solved the structures; X.G. expressed and purified rhodopsinarrestin complexes, characterized their binding and thermal stability, discovered the initial crystallization conditions with 9.7 MAG, prepared most crystals for synchrotron data collection, prepared all crystals for the final data collection by SFX, helped with SFX data collection, and established the initial cross-linking method for the rhodopsin-arrestin complex; Y.H. designed and performed Tango assays and disulfide bond cross-linking experiments; C.Z. developed the mammalian expression methods; P.W.dW helped with XFEL data processing and performed computational experiments; J.K., M.H.E.T., K. M. S-P., K. P., J. M., Y.J., X.Y.Z., and Q.C. performed cell culture, mutagenesis, protein purification, rhodopsin-arrestin binding experiments; W.L. and A.I. grew crystals and collected synchrotron data at APS and SFX data at LCLS, G.W.H. and Q.X. determined and validated the structure. Z.Z. and V.K. constructed the full model, the phosphorylated rhodopsin-arrestin model, and help writing the paper; D.W., S.L., D.J., C.K., Sh.B., and N.A. Z. helped with XFEL data collection and initial data analysis; S.B., M.M., and G.J.W. set up the XFEL experiment, performed the data collection, and commented on the paper. A.B., T.W., C.G., O.Y., and H.C. helped with XFEL data collection and data analysis, processed the data and helped with structure validation. G.M. W., B.P., and P.G. performed HDX experiments and helped with manuscript writing. J.L. helped initiate this collaborative project and with writing the paper. M.W. collected the 7.7 Å dataset at Swiss Light Source. A.M.,...

SUMMARY G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate diverse signaling in part through interaction with arrestins, whose binding promotes receptor internalization and signaling through G protein-independent pathways. High-affinity arrestin binding requires receptor phosphorylation, often at the receptor’s C-terminal tail. Here we report an X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) crystal structure of the rhodopsin–arrestin complex, in which the phosphorylated C-terminus of rhodopsin forms an extended intermolecular β-sheet with the N-terminal β-strands of arrestin. Phosphorylation was detected at rhodopsin C-terminal tail residues T336 and S338. These two phospho-residues, together with E341, form an extensive network of electrostatic interactions with three positively charged pockets in arrestin in a mode that resembles binding of the phosphorylated vasopressin-2 receptor tail to β-arrestin-1. Based on these observations, we derived and validated a set of phosphorylation codes that serve as a common mechanism for phosphorylation-dependent recruitment of arrestins by GPCRs.

Arrestins comprise a family of signal regulators of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which include arrestins 1 to 4. While arrestins 1 and 4 are visual arrestins dedicated to rhodopsin, arrestins 2 and 3 (Arr2 and Arr3) are β-arrestins known to regulate many nonvisual GPCRs. The dynamic and promiscuous coupling of Arr2 to nonvisual GPCRs has posed technical challenges to tackle the basis of arrestin binding to GPCRs. Here we report the structure of Arr2 in complex with neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1), which reveals an overall assembly that is strikingly different from the visual arrestin-rhodopsin complex by a 90°rotation of Arr2 relative to the receptor. In this new configuration, intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) and transmembrane helix 6 (TM6) of the receptor are oriented toward the N-terminal domain of the arrestin, making it possible for GPCRs that lack the C-terminal tail to couple Arr2 through their ICL3. Molecular dynamics simulation and crosslinking data further support the assembly of the Arr2-NTSR1 complex. Sequence analysis and homology modeling suggest that the Arr2-NTSR1 complex structure may provide an alternative template for modeling arrestin-GPCR interactions.

Class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are receptors for peptide hormones that include glucagon, parathyroid hormone, and calcitonin. These receptors are involved in a wide spectrum of physiological activities, from metabolic regulation and stress control to development and maintenance of the skeletal system. As such, they are important drug targets for the treatment of diabetes, osteoporosis, and stress related disorders. Class B GPCRs are organized into two modular domains: an extracellular domain (ECD) and a helical bundle that contains seven transmembrane helices (TM domain). The ECD is responsible for the high affinity and specificity of hormone binding, and the TM domain is required for receptor activation and signal coupling to downstream G-proteins. Although the structure of the full-length receptor remains unknown, the ECD structures have been well characterized for a number of Class B GPCRs, revealing a common fold for ligand recognition. This review summarizes the general structural principles that guide hormone binding by Class B ECDs and their implications in the design of peptide hormone analogs for therapeutic purposes.