The incidence of OME accompanying cleft palate has decreased in Asian patients in the past 5 years. Tympanometry is not a very reliable tool for evaluating OME in children with cleft palate younger than 14 months, especially those younger than 9 months. Meticulous examination of the middle ear during palatoplasty is necessary for making a definite diagnosis and deciding on the use of a grommet.

BackgroundInterferon Regulatory Factor 6 (IRF6) is a member of the IRF family of transcription factors. It has been suggested to be an important contributor to orofacial development since mutations of the IRF6 gene has been found in Van der Woude (VWS) and popliteal pterygium syndromes (PPS), two disorders that can present with isolated cleft lip and palate. The association between IRF6 gene and cleft lip and palate has also been independently replicated in many populations.MethodsWe screened a total of 155 Taiwanese patients with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P); 31 syndromic (including 19 VWS families), 44 non-syndromic families with at least two affected members, and 80 non-syndromic patients through a combined targeted, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based mutation analysis for the entire coding regions of IRF6 gene.ResultsWe found 11 mutations in 57.89% (11/19) of the VWS patients and no IRF6 mutation in 44 of the non-syndromic multiplex families and 80 non-syndromic oral cleft patients. In this IRF6 gene screening, five of these mutations (c.290 A>G, p.Tyr97Cys; c.360-375 16 bp deletion, p.Gln120HisfsX24; c.411_412 insA, p.Glu136fsX3; c.871 A>C, p.Thr291Pro; c.969 G>A, and p.Trp323X) have not been reported in the literature previously. Exon deletion was not detected in this series of IRF6 gene screening.ConclusionsOur results confirm the crucial role of IRF6 in the VWS patients and further work is needed to explore for its function in the non-syndromic oral cleft with vary clinical features.

Objective: To evaluate genetic variants within the regulatory regions of interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) and TP63 for the etiology of nonsyndromic oral clefts risk factors. Design: We performed allelic transmission disequilibrium test analysis on 5 eligible single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and SNP haplotypes using the Family-Based Association Test. Participants: The study sample consisted of 334 case–parent trios of nonsyndromic oral clefts from Taiwanese population, separated into nonsyndromic cleft lip/palate (NSCL/P) and nonsyndromic cleft palate only (NSCPO) groups. Results: We found all 3 selected SNPs of the IRF6 gene show significant association with nonsyndromic oral clefts (rs2235371, P = 5.10E-07; rs642961, P = .00194; and rs77542756, P = 9.08E-07). Haplotype analyses identified 3 possible SNP combination haplotypes in the IRF6 gene and found that C-G-G showed significant undertransmission (P = .058), whereas 2 other haplotypes, T-G-A and C-A-G (P = 2.71E-06 and P = 5.00E-04, respectively), were significantly overtransmitted to the NSCL/P children but not to the NSCPO children. For the TP63 gene, we failed to detect evidence of nonsyndromic oral cleft association in the 2 SNPs within the TP63 large intron 1 region. Conclusions: We used a family-based analysis in 334 Taiwanese case–parent trios to evaluate selected SNPs of IRF6 genes and TP63 genes for a risk of orofacial clefting. This study provides additional evidence for an association between IRF6 and NSCL/P, including the genetic variants within the 5′-noncoding region of the gene. We also confirmed that NSCL/P and NSCPO individuals belong to different groups. For the TP63, our data did not favor the direct involvement of TAp63 isoforms during orofacial development.

Objective: Nonsyndromic oral clefts are common birth defect with complex etiology. In the present study, we attempt to further validate the possible role for ABCA4 and ARHGAP29 in the susceptibility to nonsyndromic oral clefts. Design: We performed allelic transmission disequilibrium test analysis, on 10 eligible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and SNP haplotypes using the Family-Based Association Test. Participants: The study sample consisted of 334 case–parent trios of nonsyndromic oral clefts from Taiwanese population, separated into nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) and nonsyndromic cleft palate only (NSCPO) groups. Results: We found only the SNP rs560426 within the ABCA4 gene showed strong association with NSCPO ( P = .03498; Permuted P = .05382). No association between other 9 selected SNPs in ABCA4-ARHGAP29 region and the risk of nonsyndromic oral clefts was found. For the haplotype analyses, we found only haplotype T-C (rs570926 and rs3789431) in ABCA4 block 2 showed significant association with nonsyndromic NSCL/P in these Taiwanese trios. Conclusions: We used a family-based analysis in 334 Taiwanese case–parent trios to validate the possible role for ABCA4 and ARHGAP29 in the susceptibility to nonsyndromic oral clefts. This study provides a new evidence for an association between the intron variant rs560426 within ABCA4 and nonsyndromic cleft palate which may contribute their regulatory role in craniofacial development.