To determine the immunologic effects of oropharyngeal colostrum administration in extremely premature infants. METHODS:We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 48 preterm infants born before 28 weeks' gestation. Subjects received 0.2 mL of their mother's colostrum or sterile water via oropharyngeal route every 3 hours for 3 days beginning at 48 to 96 hours of life. To measure concentrations of secretory immunoglobulin A, lactoferrin, and several immune substances, urine and saliva were obtained during the first 24 hours of life and at 8 and 15 days. Clinical data during hospitalization were collected.RESULTS: Urinary levels of secretory immunoglobulin A at 1 week (71.4 vs 26.5 ng/g creatinine, P = .04) and 2 weeks (233.8 vs 48.3 ng/g creatinine, P = .006), and lactoferrin at 1 week (3.5 vs 0.9 mg/g creatinine, P = .01) were significantly higher in colostrum group. Urine interleukin-1b level was significantly lower in colostrum group at 2 weeks (55.3 vs 91.8 mg/g creatinine, P = .01). Salivary transforming growth factor-b1 (39.2 vs 69.7 mg/mL, P = .03) and interleukin-8 (1.2 vs 4.9 ng/mL, P = .04) were significantly lower at 2 weeks in colostrum group. A significant reduction in the incidence of clinical sepsis was noted in colostrum group (50% vs 92%, P = .003).CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that oropharyngeal administration of colostrum may decrease clinical sepsis, inhibit secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and increase levels of circulating immune-protective factors in extremely premature infants. Larger studies to confirm these findings are warranted. WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT:Immunerelated bioactive proteins are highly concentrated in the colostrum of mothers who deliver preterm infants. Oropharyngeal administration was proposed as a safe and feasible alternative method of providing colostrum to immunocompromised premature infants. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:Oropharyngeally administered colostrum during the first few days of life increased urinary secretory immunoglobulin A and lactoferrin, decreased urinary interleukin-1b, reduced salivary transforming growth factor-b1 and interleukin-8, and reduced the occurrence of clinical sepsis in extremely premature infants.
Two major isoforms of theHere, Runx2-II expression was found to be specifically stimulated by BMP-2 treatment or by Dlx5 overexpression. In addition, BMP-2, Dlx5, and Runx2-II were found to be expressed in osteogenic fronts and parietal bones of the developing cranial vault and Runx2-I and Msx2 in the sutural mesenchyme. Furthermore, Runx2 P1 promoter activity was strongly stimulated by Dlx5 overexpression, whereas Runx2 P2 promoter activity was not. Runx2 P1 promoter deletion analysis indicated that the Dlx5-specific response is due to sequences between ؊756 and ؊342 bp of the P1 promoter, where three Dlx5-response elements are located. Dlx5 responsiveness to these elements was confirmed by gel mobility shift assay and site-directed mutagenesis. Moreover, Msx2 specifically suppressed the Runx2 P1 promoter, and the responsible region overlaps with that recognized by Dlx5. In summary, Dlx5 specifically transactivates the Runx2 P1 promoter, and its action on the P1 promoter is antagonized by Msx2.The Runt-related transcription factor Runx2 plays an essential role in osteoblast differentiation and bone mineralization (1, 2). Two major isoforms are expressed from the mouse Runx2 locus, and these isoforms are generated by different promoter usage. Runx2 type I (Runx2-I), 2 referred to as the Cbfa1/p56 isoform or PEBP2␣A, is a 513-amino acid protein that starts with the amino acid sequence MRIPV (3) and is derived from the proximal P2 promoter of the gene (4). More recently, upstream exons of the Runx2 gene that potentially encode the N termini of Runx2 isoforms expressed in osteoblasts have been identified (5, 6). These upstream exons contain a 5Ј-untranslated region and encode the N-terminal 19 amino acids of Runx2 type II (Runx2-II; also referred to as Cbfa1/p57 and OSF2), which starts with the sequence MASNSL (7). This isoform is expressed from the P1 or "bone-related" upstream promoter (8), and its expression is predominant in osteoblasts (9). The alternative promoter usage strongly implies that the expression pattern of each isoform differs temporally and/or spatially. Indeed, they exhibit distinct expression patterns during bone development (10, 11). Thus, it is natural to assume that these two promoters differently respond to different extracellular signals or their downstream transcription factors because these promoters have distinct transcription factor-binding sites.Runx2 plays a central role in the BMP-2-induced trans-differentiation of C2C12 cells at an early restriction point by diverting them from the myogenic pathway to the osteogenic pathway (12, 13). We found that the homeobox gene Dlx5 is an upstream target of BMP-2 signaling and that it plays a pivotal role in stimulating the downstream osteogenic master transcription factor Runx2. In turn, Runx2 acts simultaneously or sequentially to induce the expression of bone-specific genes that represent BMP-2-induced osteogenic trans-differentiation. In addition, it has also been suggested that Dlx5 is a critical target of the inhibitory action of transform...
Calvarial bone is formed by the intramembranous bone-forming process, which involves many signaling molecules. The constitutive activation of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling pathway accelerates osteoblast differentiation and results in premature cranial suture closure. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathways, which involve the downstream transcription factors Dlx5 and Msx2, are also involved in the bone-forming processes. However, the relationships between these two main signaling cascades are still unclear. We found that FGF2 treatment of developing bone fronts stimulated Bmp2 gene expression but that BMP2 treatment could not induce Fgf2 expression. Moreover, the disruption of the Runx2 gene completely eliminated the expression of Bmp2 and its downstream genes Dlx5 and Msx2 in the developing primordium of bone, while the expression of Fgf2 was maintained. In addition, cultured Runx2؊/؊ cells expressed very low baseline levels of Bmp2 that were up-regulated by transfection with a Runx2-expressing plasmid. These levels in turn were markedly elevated by FGF2 treatment. FGF2 treatment also strongly enhanced the Bmp2 expression in MC3T3-E1 cells, whose endogenous Runx2 gene is intact and which express Bmp2 at low baseline levels as well. These results indicate that Runx2 is an important mediator of the expression of Bmp2 in response to FGF stimulation in cranial bone development.
Vanillin can be obtained from waste of lignocellulosic bioresources with various methods. 1−3 Such vanillin was used as chain extender [divanillin-ethanol amine conjugate (DV-EA)] after its dimerization and further modification with ethanolamine in the synthesis of biobased polyurethane, thereby increasing wt % of biocontents in the final polymer. 1,4-Butanediol often used as a general chain extender in polyurethane synthesis was replaced partially with DV-EA. The generated polyurethane hard segment consists of DV-EA polyol and MDI (methylene diisocyanate) units or 1,4-butanediol and MDI units, respectively. The properties of the DV-EA-based polyurethane were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA), X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD), and universal testing machine (UTM). The results showed that this advanced polyurethane has 128% of Young's modulus and 147% of increased strain compared to those of control, while its strength and thermal stability were maintained. It is expected that this new biobased tetraol may inspire a new perspective of vanillin application in biobased polyurethane synthesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.