Background: The coracoclavicular fixation with suture anchors adds stability to type IIb distal clavicle fractures fixed with a plate and screws when loaded to failure. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between the use of a locking compression plate (LCP) with all-suture anchor fixation and hook LCP fixation of Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures. Methods: A total of 82 consecutive patients who underwent plate fixation for Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures were included. The subjects were divided into two groups: an LCP with all-suture anchor fixation group and hook LCP fixation group. For clinical assessments, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Korean shoulder score (KSS), and Constant score were recorded. A percentage of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD%) was used to evaluate fracture reduction. Typical reported complications, such as secondary dislocation, implant failure or loosening, peri-implant fracture, acromion osteolysis, stiffness, peri-anchor osteolysis, postoperative acromioclavicular joint arthrosis, nonunion, or delayed union, were also analyzed. Results: There were no differences in the clinical and radiological outcomes at the final follow-up between the two groups. The period for bone union and CCD% showed no significant differences between groups. Stiffness at 3 months after surgery of LCP with all-suture anchor fixation ( n = 3, 10.7%) was less than that of hook LCP fixation ( n = 17, 31.5%). The complication rate also showed no significant differences between groups. However, LCP with all-suture anchor fixation had anchor-related complications, although it can reduce hook-related complications. Conclusion: LCP with all-suture anchor fixation showed satisfactory outcomes in comparison with hook LCP fixation. In Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures, LCP with all-suture anchor fixation is a useful method for the maintenance of reduction, avoiding implant removal, and hook-related complications. However, anchor fixation should be carefully used, especially in osteoporotic patients or patients with underlying diseases. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective study.

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of MRI in identifying ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), radial collateral ligament (RCL), and volar plate (VP) injuries of the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) of the thumb by comparing with diagnostic arthroscopy. Methods: A total of 56 consecutive patients (56 thumbs) who underwent arthroscopy of MCPJ of thumb were enrolled. MRI findings reviewed by consensus reading of two blinded radiologists were compared with arthroscopic examination. Statistical data, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, were analyzed. Additionally, the performance characteristics between 3.0-tesla (39 thumbs) and 1.5-tesla (17 thumbs) MRI and acute (≤4 weeks after injury) and chronic (>4 weeks) injuries were compared. Results: Of the 56 thumbs, 38 thumbs (67.9%) showed complete correspondence between MRI and arthroscopic findings. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI for detecting UCL injuries were 78.8%, 87.0%, and 82.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI for detecting RCL injuries were 85.7%, 91.4%, and 85.7%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI for detecting VP injuries were 89.5%, 89.2%, and 81.0%, respectively. 3.0-tesla MRI showed higher correspondence with arthroscopic observation (76.9%) than 1.5-tesla MRI (47.1%) (p = 0.028). For acute injuries, 78.4% showed complete correspondence between MRI and arthroscopic findings, whereas 47.4% with chronic injuries revealed complete agreement (p = 0.019). Conclusion: Overall, MRI is moderately effective in evaluating ligamentous lesions around MCPJ of thumb, but MRI is more sensitive in diagnosing acute injuries. Furthermore, 3.0-tesla MRI can provide results with better accuracy for diagnosing ligamentous lesions around MCPJ of thumb. However, the sensitivity and the specificity are not applicable to all ligament injuries, but only the severe one which would agree for surgical options.

No abstract