Aim and Objectives To examine the influence of staff nurses’ individual factors on knowledge, attitudes and implementation of evidence‐based practice in Saudi Arabia and to identify facilitators and barriers to evidence‐based practice implementation. Background Evidence‐based practice has been considered as a key for healthcare quality measure. The literature, however, shows that nurses worldwide are not implementing evidence‐based practice as expected and recommended by governing agencies. In Saudi Arabia, evidence‐based practice implementation has not been addressed sufficiently. Design A cross‐sectional, correlational design was used. We have complied with the guidelines of STROBE Checklist in presenting this research. A convenience sample of staff nurses (n = 227) was selected from four hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The survey questions included the Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire and individual factors. Data were analysed using multiple linear regression models. Results Attitudes towards evidence‐based practice had the highest mean followed by evidence‐based practice knowledge and implementation means. Evidence‐based practice training and research involvement were associated with knowledge in the bivariate and multivariate analyses. None of the individual factors were associated with attitudes. However, knowledge was associated with attitudes. Knowledge and attitudes influenced evidence‐based practice implementation positively. Unexpectedly, receiving evidence‐based practice training made it more difficult for nurses to participate in evidence‐based practice implementation process. We found that attitudes partially mediated the relationship between knowledge and evidence‐based practice implementation. Conclusion Nurses in Saudi Arabia are willing to be involved in the evidence‐based practice process. However, nurses identified that they need to improve their knowledge and skills in order to be active participants in the process. Relevance to clinical practice Organisations and nursing leadership may benefit from developing a comprehensive strategy to promote staff nurses’ involvement in the evidence‐based practice process through providing continuing education and mentoring programmes about evidence‐based practice.

The purpose of this interdisciplinary descriptive study was to examine the perceptions of nurses, school personnel, and parents about school reentry for children with cancer and to determine whether activities and services performed supported school reentry. The study also investigated parents' perception of the impact of cancer on their child's academic performance, cognitive ability, and school attendance. Results of the study showed that few activities and services were performed to facilitate children's school reentry by either nurses or school personnel. Parents reported no significant differences in their children's cognitive ability or academic performance. School attendance was significantly lower after diagnosis and therapy. Conclusions were that communication among nurses, school personnel, and parents was a major barrier to providing effective services to students and their parents. Nurses were unsure of how to help parents navigate the school bureaucracy, school personnel felt they needed more information, and parents felt that their children were not receiving all the school reentry services needed. Individuals in this study recommended that a liaison position be created to coordinate services.

Many Korean Americans suffer from high levels of cancer incidence and have low cancer screening rates. A significant number of Korean Americans lack adequate information about cancer screening tests. However, little is known about their health behaviors. This article examines exposure to mass media and health information-seeking behaviors for Korean Americans, and their associations with demographic characteristics influencing variations in exposure to the different health information and trust in health information sources. The authors gathered data for this study using a cross-sectional, community-based survey conducted in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area during 2006 and 2007. It was administered to 254 Korean Americans who were 40 years of age or older. This study is part of the first health-related program of research to study exposure to mass media, health and cancer information sources, and seeking preferences and experiences of Korean Americans. Results indicated that Korean ethnic media sources and Internet are important sources used regularly. Age, years of education completed, and English proficiency levels for Korean Americans significantly predicted the likelihood of their Internet use. Low-income Korean Americans with less education were more likely to seek health information in Korean ethnic magazines and newspapers, whereas Korean Americans with higher education and English proficiency were more likely to seek information online. The most trusted source of health information among respondents was from a doctor or other health care professional. Future research should be conducted to determine whether physicians are actually used as a primary source for health information.

A high percentage of Korean American (KA) women have never had a mammogram, which puts them at greater risk for late-stage breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare health beliefs and spousal support about breast cancer and screening between KA women with and without a history of mammogram completion. Crosssectional data were obtained from 428 non-adherent married KA women. KA women who never had a mammogram were younger, had less access to health care, had less knowledge, and had lower perceived self-efficacy, benefits, and spousal support, and higher perceived barriers to breast cancer screening compared to women who had had a mammogram. Assessing differing characteristics between the two groups of KA women may lead to a better understanding of the variables influencing mammography screening in this population and possibly increase early screening.

These findings emphasize the need for cultural interventions to disrupt fatalistic attitudes towards colon cancer preventions.