While both P-CT and angiography are useful in predicting the development of pancreatic necrosis in patients with SAP, P-CT appears to be more accurate for this purpose.
The primary tumour location is an important prognostic factor for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the predictive efficacies of primary tumour location, early tumour shrinkage (ETS), and depth of response (DpR) on mCRC treatment has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to investigate the predictive efficacies of these traits in mCRC patients treated with first-line 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus biologic agents, namely, cetuximab and bevacizumab. This was a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 110 patients with pathology-documented unresectable mCRC. Patients with left-sided mCRC receiving any first-line regimen showed better overall survival (OS) than those with right-sided mCRC [33.3 vs 16.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27–0.74; p < 0.001]. In patients with left-sided tumours, treatment with chemotherapy plus cetuximab yielded longer OS than chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (50.6 vs 27.8 months, HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32–0.97; p = 0.0378). mCRC patients with ETS and high DpR showed better OS than those lacking ETS and with low DpR (33.5 vs 19.6 months, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32–0.79, p = 0.023 and 38.3 vs 19.0 months, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28–0.68, p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, ETS and/or high DpR achieved in patients with right-sided mCRC receiving chemotherapy plus cetuximab were associated with significantly better OS than in those lacking ETS and with low DpR (34.3 vs 10.4 months, HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04–0.94, p = 0.025 and 34.3 vs 10.4 months, HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04–0.94, p = 0.0257, respectively). Taken together, our study demonstrates that primary tumour location is not only a well-known prognostic factor but also a relevant predictive factor in patients with mCRC receiving chemotherapy plus cetuximab. Additionally, both ETS and DpR could predict treatment outcomes and also potentially guide cetuximab treatment even in right-sided mCRCs.
Colonic angiodysplasia (AGD) is an important cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. However, most episodes of bleeding from colonic AGD stop spontaneously. To date, few data are available regarding the endoscopic findings of bleeding colonic AGD. In order to clarify the clinical features and endoscopic findings of actively bleeding colonic AGD, we conducted a retrospective study of patients treated with colonoscopy at our hospital. From November 2006 to March 2013 inclusive, 32,586 colonoscopies were performed at this hospital, among which 13 patients with bleeding colonic AGD were enrolled in the current study. The mean age was 84 years (range: 69-90 years). All patients had chronic heart disease and were currently using anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet drugs. Sites of bleeding AGD were localized in the left colon in two patients (15 %) and in the right colon in the remaining patients (85 %). A total of 77 % of the lesions (10/13) were 1-2 mm in size and two lesions were 4 mm in size; only one lesion was larger than 5 mm. Endoscopic treatment resulted in a therapeutic success rate of 100 %, and no recurrence of bleeding was observed in 85 % of the patients (11/13) after treatment. During the study period, two patients presented with bleeding from residual AGD and underwent endoscopic treatment. In the present study, most sites of bleeding colonic AGD were very small, termed "micro-angiodysplasia", and targeted endoscopic treatment for actively bleeding AGD was found to be effective and safe. It is essential that physicians consider the potential for actively bleeding colonic AGD, especially "micro-angiodysplasia", when performing colonoscopy in elderly patients with a history of cardiovascular disease and/or treatment with anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.