No abstract

Background:Occasionally it is difficult to inhibit electrical storm (ES) with standard pharmacological treatment. In the present study the effect of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting β1-selective blocker, on ES refractory to class III antiarrhythmic drugs was evaluated. Methods and Results:The study group comprised 42 consecutive patients who developed ES for which intravenous class III antiarrhythmic drugs, such as amiodarone and nifekalant, were ineffective. Landiolol was administered intravenously with an initial dose of 2.5 μg · kg -1 · min -1 , which was doubled if it was ineffective, up to a maximum dose of 80 μg · kg -1 · min -1 . Landiolol inhibited ES in 33 patients (79%) at a mean dose of 7.5±12.2 μg · kg -1 · min -1 . All patients in whom landiolol was ineffective died of arrhythmia. Of the 33 patients in whom landiolol was effective, 25 survived and were discharged (60% of all patients). Landiolol significantly decreased heart rate (P<0.0001), but did not affect blood pressure. Landiolol was not discontinued for adverse effects in any of the responders. Age, APACHE II score, and pH of arterial blood gas differed significantly between the responders and nonresponders. Conclusions:Landiolol is useful as a life-saving drug for class III antiarrhythmic drug-resistant ES. The main mechanism of ES refractory to class III antiarrhythmic drugs could be abnormal automaticity but not reentry. (Circ J 2010; 74: 856 - 863)

This study reveals that HRT detected by 24-hour Holter ECG can predict cardiac mortality in post-MI patients whether DM is present or not.

Background: His-bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological form of pacing. Although high capture thresholds are common, few predictors of low HBP threshold have been determined. We aimed to identify electrophysiological predictors. Methods: Fifty-one patients (53% with atrioventricular block) underwent HBP for bradycardia with an intrinsic QRS duration of <120 ms. Attempts to anchor the HBP lead were guided by unipolar His-bundle electrograms (HB EGMs) recorded with an electrophysiology recording system. Patients were followed-up for >6 months. Results: In total, 153 attempts at anchoring the HBP lead were made, of which, 45 achieved acceptable HBP thresholds (≤2.5 V at 1 ms). The amplitude of negative deflection in HB EGM and the selective HBP form at fixation were independently associated with achieving an acceptable threshold. A negative amplitude of ≥0.060 mV in HB EGM was determined as the optimal value for identifying the acceptable threshold. This deep negative HB EGM was recorded with an HBP threshold of 1.4±1.3 V (in 34 attempts), significantly lower than that of positive HB EGM without deep negative deflection (2.8±1.3 V, in 31 trials; or >5 V, in 38 trials). The permanent HBP lead remained with deep negative (≥0.060 mV) or positive HB EGMs in 28 and 14 patients, respectively, and with positive or negative HB injury current in 19 and 23 patients, respectively. During follow-up, increased HBP threshold of >1 V was significantly more prevalent in the positive HB EGM group. The HBP thresholds of deep negative HB EGM and HB injury current, but not of the selective HBP group, were significantly lower than the other subgroups during follow-up. Conclusions: Deep negative HB EGM at fixation was associated with an excellent short-term HBP threshold, similar to HB injury current. Analysis of unipolar HB EGM postfixation may enable prediction of permanent HBP threshold.

No abstract