The objectives of this study were to compare the molecular and biological characteristics of recent porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) field isolates to those of a modified live virus (MLV) PRRS vaccine and its parent strain. One hundred seventeen, 4-week-old pigs were randomly assigned to six groups. Group 1 (n ؍ 20) served as sham-inoculated negative controls, group 2 (n ؍ 19) was inoculated with Ingelvac PRRS MLV vaccine, group 3 (n ؍ 20) was inoculated with the parent strain of the vaccine (ATCC VR2332), group 4 (n ؍ 19) was inoculated with vaccine-like PRRSV field isolate 98-38803, group 5 (n ؍ 19) was inoculated with PRRSV field isolate 98-37120, and group 6 (n ؍ 20) was inoculated with known high-virulence PRRSV isolate ATCC VR2385. The levels of severity of gross lung lesions (0 to 100%) among the groups were significantly different at both 10 (P < 0.0001) and 28 days postinoculation (p.
Molecular diagnosis of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRS) and porcine circo virus (PCV) are challenging due to high genetic diversity in the viral genomes. Differentiating PRRS vaccine strains is even more challenging and is currently done by DNA sequencing, which is expensive and time-consuming. A multiplexed system (Luminex) allowing multiple detection targets in the same reaction is available. However, this system is not fully developed for common swine pathogens. Therefore, an assay was built to detect the majority of field PRRS strains by using different pairs of primers, and at the same time, to provide differentiation of the four PRRS vaccine strains used in the US by using vaccine-specific primers. Two sets of detection primer pairs were used that detect 85.4% and 91.2% of the 694 full genomes of the current PRRS collection in the GenBank. The combination of the 2 primer pairs will detect 98.1% of the genomes in the GenBank. Testing a limited number of field strains and the four vaccine strains (PrimePac, Ingelvac MLV, Ingelvac ATP, and Fostera) available in the US indicated that the assay detected all strains and identified each of the four vaccine strains correctly.Recently, clinical signs of porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome, reproductive failure and multisystemic inflammation have been associated with PCV3. A real-time PCR assay is developed based on 67 PCV3 full-genome sequences with 100% detection rate. Also, 1,907 available PCV2 genomes were analyzed. Based on this analysis, 2 primer pairs were designed to detect an estimated 94.8% and 90.5% field strains, respectively, with a combined detection rate of 99%. The PCV3 and PCV2 assays were then combined into one reaction with an internal control to monitor the DNA extraction efficiencies. The combined multiplex assay detected all PCV3 and 99% of PCV2 strains with no cross-detection observed. SummaryMolecular diagnosis of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRS) and porcine circo virus (PCV) are challenging due to high genetic diversity in the viral genomes. Differentiating PRRS vaccine strains is even more challenging and is currently done by DNA sequencing, which is expensive and time-consuming. A multiplexed system (Luminex) allowing multiple detection targets in the same reaction is available. However, this system is not fully developed for common swine pathogens. Therefore, an assay was built to detect the majority of field PRRS strains by using different pairs of primers, and at the same time, to provide differentiation of the four PRRS vaccine strains used in the US by using vaccine-specific primers. Two sets of detection primer pairs were used that detect 85.4% and 91.2% of the 694 full genomes of the current PRRS collection in the GenBank. The combination of the 2 primer pairs will detect 98.1% of the genomes in the GenBank. Testing a limited number of field strains and the four vaccine strains (PrimePac, Ingelvac MLV, Ingelvac ATP, and Fostera) available in the US indicated that ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.