The water-level time series of a tidal river is influenced by various factors and has a complex structure, which limits its use as hydrological forecast data. This study proposes a methodology for decomposing the water-level time series of a tidal river into various components that influence the water level. To this end, the tide, wave, rainfall-induced runoff and noise components were selected as the main components that affect the water-level time series. The tide component and the wave component were first separated through wavelet analysis and curve fitting and then they were removed from the water-level data. A high-pass filter was then applied to the resulting time series to separate the rainfall-induced runoff component and the noise component. These methods made it possible to determine the rate of influence that each component has on the water level of a tidal river. The results could be used as a basis for calibrating a rainfall-runoff model and issuing flood forecasts and warnings for a tidal river.

Abstract:Most runoff analyses using a grid-based distributed model use one parameter group calibrated at the outlet of a watershed, instead of dividing the watershed into subwatersheds. Significant differences between the observed value and the simulation result of the subwatersheds can occur if just one parameter group is used in all subwatersheds that have different hydrological characteristics from each other. Therefore, to improve the simulation results of the subwatersheds within a watershed, a model calibrated at every subwatershed needs to be used to reflect the characteristics of each subwatershed. In this study, different parameter groups were set up for one or two sites using a distributed model, the GRM (Grid based Rainfall-runoff Model), and the evaluations were based on the results of rainfall-runoff analysis, which uses a multi-site calibration (MSC) technique to calibrate the model at the outlet of each site. The Hyangseok watershed in Naeseong River, which is a tributary of Nakdong River in Korea, was chosen as the study area. The watershed was divided into five subwatersheds each with a subwatershed outlet that was applied to the calibration sites. The MSC was applied for five cases. When a site was added for calibration in a watershed, the runoff simulation showed better results than the calibration of only one site at the most downstream area of the watershed. The MSC approach could improve the simulation results on the calibrated sites and even on the non-calibrated sites, and the effect of MSC was improved when the calibrated site was closer to the runoff site.

The choice of the computational time step (dt) value and the method for setting dt can have a bearing on the accuracy and performance of a simulation, and this effect has not been comprehensively researched across different simulation conditions. In this study, the effects of the fixed time step (FTS) method and the automatic time step (ATS) method on the simulated runoff of a distributed rainfall–runoff model were compared. The results revealed that the ATS method had less peak flow variability than the FTS method for the virtual catchment. In the FTS method, the difference in time step had more impact on the runoff simulation results than the other factors such as differences in the amount of rainfall, the density of the stream network, or the spatial resolution of the input data. Different optimal parameter values according to the computational time step were found when FTS and ATS were used in a real catchment, and the changes in the optimal parameter values were smaller in ATS than in FTS. The results of our analyses can help to yield reliable runoff simulation results.

No abstract

No abstract