No abstract

β-agonists are anabolic compounds that promote fat loss and muscle gain, and their administration to livestock may provide economic benefits by increasing growth rate and feed efficiency. For these reasons, β-agonists are also commonly added to livestock feed as growth promoters. This can introduce a significant risk of secondary human poisoning through intake of contaminated meat. A new method for the simultaneous determination of three β-agonists (clenbuterol, ractopamine, and zilpaterol) was developed in this study and applied to various meat samples. The limits of quantification, derived through a validation test following Codex guidelines, were 0.2 μg/kg for clenbuterol and zilpaterol, and 0.4 μg/kg for ractopamine. The average recoveries for clenbuterol, ractopamine, and zilpaterol ranged from 109.1% to 118.3%, 95.3% to 109.0%, and 94.1% to 120.0%, respectively. The recovery and coefficient of variation (CV) values fell within the acceptable range according to the Codex guidelines. This method reduced the analysis time without decreasing detection efficiency by modifying the pretreatment steps. This method could be utilized to manage the safety of imported meat products from countries where zilpaterol use is still permitted, thereby improving public health and preventing β-agonist poisoning due to secondary contamination.

The extent to which resection of unstable leaf should be performed in horizontal cleavage meniscus tear has not yet been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of partial meniscectomy for horizontal cleavage tear of medial meniscus between complete resection of inferior leaf including the periphery up to the joint capsule and partial resection leaving stable peripheral torn meniscal tissue. A total of 126 patients who underwent partial meniscectomy for horizontal cleavage tear of medial meniscus were divided into two groups: group C (n = 34), treated with the complete resection of the inferior leaf; and group P (n = 92), treated with partial resection of the inferior leaf. The minimum follow-up duration was 3 years. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm knee scoring scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Radiologic assessments were performed using the IKDC radiographic assessment scale and measurement of the height of the joint space in the medial compartment of the tibiofemoral joint. The functional outcomes including the Lysholm knee, IKDC subjective score, activities of daily living and sport and recreation subscale of KOOS were worse in group C than in group P (p < 0.001). The radiologic outcomes including postoperative IKDC radiographic scale (p = 0.003) and the postoperative joint space on the affected side (p < 0.001) were also worse in group C than in group P. In the horizontal cleavage tear of medial meniscus, complete resection of the inferior leaf including the periphery up to the joint capsule showed inferior clinical outcomes compared with partial resection leaving stable peripheral rim of torn meniscus at minimum 3-year follow-up. If the peripheral part of the inferior leaf is stable in horizontal cleavage tear of medial meniscus, partial resection of the inferior leaf preserving peripheral rim can be recommended.

Background This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and anterior center-edge angle (ACEA) according to sex and the anterior pelvic plane (APP) tilt angle and analyze the correlation between these measurements and acetabular coverage. Methods Computed tomography scans of 71 adults (38 men and 33 women) with normal hip joints were obtained. LCEA, anterior ACEA, and acetabular coverage were measured with APP tilt every 5° from − 30° to + 30° and were compared between the sexes. The correlation between acetabular coverage and LCEA/ACEA was also analyzed. Results (1) LCEA, ACEA, and acetabular coverage were statistically larger in men than in women at all APP tilt angles (with the exception of acetabular coverage ≥ 25°). (2) LCEA, ACEA, and acetabular coverage differed according to APP tilt angle. LCEA and acetabular coverage showed maximum values at 10°. ACEA showed a tendency to increase by an average of 3.6° for every 5° increase in the APP tilt angle. LCEA demonstrated strong and very strong associations across all APP tilting angles, whereas ACEA showed a moderate association at angles ≥ 15° in men and ≥ 30° in women. Conclusions The LCEA and ACEA are adequate measurement methods that reflect actual acetabular coverage unless the pelvis is tilted excessively anteriorly. While pelvic tilting does not need to be considered for LCEA within the physiologic range, it should always be taken into account for ACEA, as it increases by an average of 3.6° for every 5° increase in APP tilt angle. Level of evidence Level III: retrospective cohort study.