The main objective of this study was to explore the mechanical and electrical output of thigh muscles derived from a range of motion (RoM) of 90 degrees (0-90 degrees flexion, LR) and the three successive RoMs: 0-30 degrees (SR1), 30-60 degrees (SR2) and 60-90 degrees (SR3). Thirteen men took part in the study. In view of the torque-velocity relationship and in order to render the test conditions as equivalent as possible, LR was tested at 90 degrees /s while the corresponding velocity for all SRs was 30 degrees /s. The findings indicated very good agreement between LR and SR2 in terms of absolute strength (particularly the concentric), within muscle eccentric to concentric strength ratios, between muscles (agonist to antagonist) strength ratios and the normalized IEMG (expressed in muV/Nm). An agreement was also noted between the mean eccentric peak torque of the knee flexors at LR and SR1 and between the mean eccentric peak torque of the knee extensors at LR and SR3. However, in general there was a lesser agreement between LR and SR1 or SR3. It is suggested that testing thigh muscles in the middle sector of knee motion (SR2) yields strength and EMG data that are close and well correlated with those derived from testing the knee along the commonly used (0-90 degrees ) RoM.

No abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the utility of measuring wrist flexors and extensors strength derived from 'full' range of motion (FRoM): 60 degrees of flexion to 30 degrees of extension, and 3 equally spaced short ranges of motion: SRoM1, 60-30 degrees and SroM2, 30-0 degrees of flexion and SRoM3, 0-30 degrees of wrist extension. Fifteen apparently healthy subjects and 8 patients suffering from unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) participated in the study. In all participants, SRoM1 findings closely resembled those obtained from FRoM. In the patient groups, the muscular strength of the uninvolved side was not different from that of the healthy subjects. On the other hand, based on a bilateral comparison (involved vs. uninvolved hand), the mean total weakness (in concentric and eccentric modes) was significantly higher in flexion (56.4 +/- 17.3%) than in extension (39.8 +/- 15.5%) but highly symmetrical between FRoM and SRoM1. Although supporting the interchangeable use of FRoM and SRoM isokinetic testing, this study highlights a hitherto unreported dynamic weakness of the wrist extension-flexion apparatus that may partly account for the general reduction in hand function reported by patients with CTS.