BackgroundMaternal perception of reduced fetal movement (RFM) is associated with increased risk of stillbirth and fetal growth restriction (FGR). RFM is thought to represent fetal compensation to conserve energy due to insufficient oxygen and nutrient transfer resulting from placental insufficiency.ObjectiveTo identify predictors of poor perinatal outcome after maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM).DesignProspective cohort study.Methods305 women presenting with RFM after 28 weeks of gestation were recruited. Demographic factors and clinical history were recorded and ultrasound performed to assess fetal biometry, liquor volume and umbilical artery Doppler. A maternal serum sample was obtained for measurement of placentally-derived or modified proteins including: alpha fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), human placental lactogen (hPL), ischaemia-modified albumin (IMA), pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and progesterone. Factors related to poor perinatal outcome were determined by logistic regression.Results22.1% of pregnancies ended in a poor perinatal outcome after RFM. The most common complication was small-for-gestational age infants. Pregnancy outcome after maternal perception of RFM was related to amount of fetal activity while being monitored, abnormal fetal heart rate trace, diastolic blood pressure, estimated fetal weight, liquor volume, serum hCG and hPL. Following multiple logistic regression abnormal fetal heart rate trace (Odds ratio 7.08, 95% Confidence Interval 1.31–38.18), (OR) diastolic blood pressure (OR 1.04 (95% CI 1.01–1.09), estimated fetal weight centile (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94–0.97) and log maternal serum hPL (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.99) were independently related to pregnancy outcome. hPL was related to placental mass.ConclusionPoor perinatal outcome after maternal perception of RFM is closely related to factors which are connected to placental dysfunction. Novel tests of placental function and associated fetal response may provide improved means to detect fetuses at greatest risk of poor perinatal outcome after RFM.

The major stumbling block for egg donation lies in the recruitment of sufficient suitable donors. This study ascertained the views of egg donors in the UK by analysing 113 completed questionnaires that asked questions about demographics, stimulus to donate, support network available, ethics, the 'process' of donation and payment. Ideas for future recruitment were also sought. The mean age of donors was 31.7 years, and most donors were donating for the first time. Ninety-one per cent of donors were Caucasian and 93% had children of their own. Ninety-six (85%) donors felt fully supported in their decision to become an egg donor and 60 (53%) discussed their donation with their GP. Information regarding egg donation came from many sources. The main motivation to donate was a desire to help childless couples. Many respondents had themselves suffered, or knew of couples with, infertility. Eighty-three (73.5%) respondents felt that expenses alone should be paid to egg donors, and many expressed concerns that large financial incentives may attract the 'wrong women' to donate. Forty-nine (43%) respondents found the procedure painful or stressful in some way, although 95% had no regrets concerning their donation, and 72% would donate again. A common reason for donors not wishing to donate again was age restriction. Respondents were asked their opinion with regard to recruitment and the enthusiasm they expressed needs to be harnessed if the current shortcomings in available donors are to be overcome. Specific recommendations to achieve this are made.

Vaginal delivery will continue to be the main method of delivery and will continue to generate a low incidence of pelvic floor morbidity. The management of injury to the anal sphincter is facilitated by close co-operation between obstetricians and colorectal surgeons.