The utilisation of the pre-operative ECG inpatients undergoing routine surgery was investigated in 354 adult patients over a 2-week period. Sixty-four percent of patients had an ECG pre-operatively. An ECG was not performed in 17% of patients who, current hospital policy suggests, should have had one. In contrast, an ECG was performed in 33% ofpatients who, hospital policy suggests, have no need of one (all of which were normal), which represented 18% of the total number of pre-operative ECGs performed.In 62% of patients with known cardiac disease, and 44% of patients with strong risk factors for ischaemic heart disease (in the absence of known disease) the ECG was abnormal. This compares with only 7% of patients aged over 50 with no risk factors in whom the ECG was abnormal. These findings suggest that there is room for improvement in the utilisation of the pre-operative ECG, which may have cost implications.
Key wordsMonitoring; electrocardiography.The pre-operative ECG is a quick, safe test performed routinely in patients with the aim of detecting pre-existing cardiovascular disease, which, if abnormal is associated with increased postoperative risk [I, 21. It may also be of value as a baseline reading in patients with known cardiac disease or cardiac risk factors to assess the significance of any postoperative ECG abnormalities. However, the accumulated cost of the test is high and, particularly in the present atmosphere of cost containment, the use of such tests needs to be reviewed frequently to ensure that they are being used in appropriate patients.Current guidelines within our hospital suggest that a pre-operative ECG should be performed in all patients who have either known cardiac disease, are at risk of cardiac disease, or who are aged over 50 years.As part of a larger survey of the pre-operative cardiovascular status of the surgical population in our hospital, we have investigated the practice of requesting pre-operative ECGs and the incidence of abnormalities.
MethodsThe survey was conducted over a 2-week period in May 1993 in all patients aged over 16 years undergoing anaesthesia in the following specialties: general surgery, urology, ophthalmic surgery, ENT surgery, neurosurgery, dental surgery and vascular surgery. Patients having emergency surgery were not included.Information was collected about each patient presenting for surgery. A careful pre-operative medical history, with particular emphasis on the cardiovascular system, was taken from each patient. Patients with known cardiac disease were defined as patients with ischaemic heart disease (previous myocardial infarction or angina) or valvular heart disease. Patients considered to be at risk of ischaemic heart disease were patients who had hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, or a past history of cardiac failure or cerebrovascular event in the absence of known cardiac disease.Patients were divided into four groups based upon their pre-operative history: group 1 = patients with known cardiac disease; group 2 = patients at ris...