Background. Torsion of greater omentum is a quite uncommon cause of acute abdomen. It can be primary or secondary but in both cases omentum twists upon itself and causes omental segmentary or diffuse necrosis. Symptoms are unspecific and preoperative diagnosis is difficult. The widespread and increasing use of computer tomography (CT) in differential diagnosis of acute abdomen can be useful for making a specific diagnosis. Objectives. This work aims to describe primary omental torsion in order to help avoid misdiagnosis, especially with acute appendicitis, which is eventually based solely on a physical examination. Case Report. We present a case of primary omental torsion in a young man and discuss contemporary methods in diagnosis and management of the condition. Conclusions. When a right diagnosis has been posed, possible treatments for omental torsion and necrosis are two: conservative or surgical. Conservative treatment had been rarely carried out because of frequent and important sequelae just like abdominal abscesses. Nowadays, surgical treatment, laparoscopic or laparotomic, is preferred because it is a safe method in diagnosis and management of this condition.

BackgroundBezoars are an uncommon cause of mechanical intestinal occlusion. There are four different kinds of bezoars: phytobezoars, made of vegetables and fibers; trichobezoars, resulting from the ingestion of hair and frequently an expression of psychiatric disorders; lactobezoars, which are formed of milk curd; and pharmacobezoars, caused by drugs and medications. Symptoms are classically indistinguishable from one another and from more common causes of intestinal occlusion, so it can be difficult to establish a correct diagnosis in order to apply the correct treatment. We present a rare case of two different phytobezoars causing intestinal occlusion (gastric and jejunal). We also describe the correct techniques for making a correct and fast diagnosis of occlusion caused by phytobezoars, and the possible conservative and operative treatments.Case presentationWe present the case of a double phytobezoar that was surgically treated with a double enterotomy. Our patient was a 68-year-old Caucasian man with a medical history of hypertension, a previous open appendectomy, and open repair of a perforated gastric ulcer. He was admitted with a 5-day history of abdominal pain located in his upper quadrants along with vomiting. After a preoperative examination, he was taken to the operating room. He was discharged in a good clinical condition 11 days after surgical intervention. A physical examination at 6 months demonstrated our patient was in good health.ConclusionsDiagnosing bezoars is difficult because of their rarity. However, they must be taken into consideration in a differential diagnosis because their treatment is not always surgical. In fact, it may be conservative in many cases and a correct diagnosis will guide towards the correct therapy.

The sclerosant effect of injected tetradecyl sulfate of sodium (STS) and hydroxy polyethoxy dodecan (HPD) was studied in the rat femoral vein. Intravenous (i.v.) and intravenous plus perivenous (i.v. + p.v.) injections of both sclerosants and physiologic saline were compared as to vein lumen occlusion, fibrosis, phlogosis, and damage to the artery and surrounding nervous and muscular tissues. The study was carried out in 30 rats treated by STS, in 30 treated by HPD, and 15 animals were injected with saline. The neurovascular bundle and adjacent muscle were removed at 48 h, 7 and 30 days and examined histologically. I.v. injections of STS produced a solid occlusion of the vein in a significant number of cases, after 30 days (P less than 0.01). A statistically significant number of solid occlusions of the femoral vein resulted after i.v. + p.v. injection of STS and HPD, at 48 h, 7 and 30 days (P less than 0.05; P less than 0.01). There was no significant difference between STS and HPD after i.v. + p.v. injection. After i.v. + p.v. we recorded a marked inflammation of muscle with signs of focal necrosis, at 48 h and 7 days. Our study indicated that i.v. + p.v. injection of STS and HPD provided a high degree of efficacy as regards vein occlusion. On the other hand, i.v. + p.v. injection induced a severe inflammation and necrosis of the tissues surrounding the sclerosed vein. Extrapolating our results to the endoscopic sclerotherapy for esophageal variceal bleeding, we conclude that paravariceal injection of sclerosants is a dangerous procedure, even though efficacious to reduce variceal hemorrhage, owing to the high risk of iatrogenic ulcers and esophageal perforation caused by muscular and mucosal necrosis.

Acute appendicitis remains the most common surgical emergency. Laparoscopy has gained increasing favor as a method of both investigating right iliac fossa pain and treating the finding of appendicitis. A question arises: what to do with an apparent healthy appendix discovered during laparoscopic surgery for other pathology. We present a case of unilateral hydroureteronephrosis complicated with rupture of the renal pelvis, due to gangrenous appendicitis with abscess of the right iliopsoas muscle and periappendicular inflammation in a 67-year-old woman, who underwent laparoscopic right annessiectomy for right ovarian cyst few years earlier, in which a healthy appendix was left inside. There is a lack of consensus in the literature about what to do with a normal appendix. The main argument for removing an apparently normal appendix is that endoluminal appendicitis may not be recognized during surgery, leading to concern that an abnormal appendix is left in place. Because of a lack of evidence from randomized trials, it remains unclear whether the benefits of routine elective coincidental appendectomy outweigh the costs and risks of morbidity associated with this prophylactic procedure. Nevertheless, it appears, from limited data, that women aged 35 years and under benefit most from elective coincidental appendectomy.

HighlightsPseudoaneurysm of pancreaticoduodenal and gastric artery are rare complications of acute pancreatitis.Arterial pseudoaneurysms have 90% of mortality if not recognized and treated during pancreatitis.Presented an unusual case of arterial pseudoaneurysm complicating acute pancreatitis because it appeared in an early phase, during the acute process, and it had an uncommon arterial localization.Presented an unusual case of arterial pseudoaneurysm complicating acute pancreatitis.It appeared in an early phase, during the acute process, and it had an uncommon arterial localization.