No abstract

STAT1 and STAT2 are cellular transcription factors involved in interferon (IFN) signaling and are thus critical for the IFN-induced antiviral state. We have previously shown that the paramyxovirus Simian Virus 5 (SV5) blocks both type I and type II interferon (IFN) signaling by targeting STAT1 for proteasome-mediated degradation. To determine whether this is a feature common to all Paramyxoviridae, we examined the abilities of SV5, Sendai virus (SeV), human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and human parainfluenza viruses types 2 and 3 (hPIV2 and hPIV3, respectively) to block interferon signaling. The results showed that in reporter assays SV5, SeV, and hPIV3 blocked both type I and type II IFN-signaling; hPIV2 blocked type I but not type II IFN-signaling; and RSV failed to block either type I or type II IFN-signaling. In agreement with these results, SV5 and SeV inhibited the formation of the ISGF3 and GAF transcription complexes (essential for type I and type II signaling, respectively). Surprisingly, although hPIV3 inhibited IFN-induction of the ISGF3 complex, GAF complexes were detected in hPIV3-infected cells. hPIV2 also blocked the formation of the ISGF3 complex but not the GAF complex, whereas RSV failed to block the induction of either complex. SV5 was the only virus that caused the degradation of STAT1. Indeed, in SeV- and hPIV3-infected cells STAT1 was phosphorylated on tyrosine 701 (Y701), a characteristic of IFN receptor activation. However, consistent with these viruses blocking IFN signaling downstream of receptor activation, there was a specific reduction in the levels of serine 727 (S727)-phosphorylated forms of STAT1alpha in SeV- and hPIV3-infected cells. In contrast both (Y701)- and (S727)-phosphorylated forms of STAT1 were detected in hPIV2-infected cells but there was a specific loss of STAT2. Both STAT1 (including Y701- and S727-phosphorylated forms) and STAT2 could readily be detected in RSV-infected cells. Despite not being able to block type I or type II IFN signaling, RSV was able to replicate in human cells that produce and respond to IFN, suggesting that RSV must have an alternative method(s) for circumventing the IFN response. These results demonstrate that, although interference with IFN signaling is a common strategy among Paramyxovirinae, distinct virus-specific mechanisms are used to achieve this end.

To replicate in vivo, viruses must circumvent cellular antiviral defense mechanisms, including those induced by the interferons (IFNs). Here we demonstrate that simian virus 5 (SV5) blocks IFN signalling in human cells by inhibiting the formation of the IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 and gamma-activated factor transcription complexes that are involved in activating IFN-α/β- and IFN-γ-responsive genes, respectively. SV5 inhibits the formation of these complexes by specifically targeting STAT1, a component common to both transcription complexes, for proteasome-mediated degradation. Expression of the SV5 structural protein V, in the absence of other virus proteins, also inhibited IFN signalling and induced the degradation of STAT1. Following infection with SV5, STAT1 was degraded in the absence of virus protein synthesis and remained undetectable for up to 4 days postinfection. Furthermore, STAT1 was also degraded in IFN-pretreated cells, even though the cells were in an antiviral state. Since pretreatment of cells with IFN delayed but did not prevent virus replication and protein synthesis, these observations suggest that following infection of IFN-pretreated cells, SV5 remains viable within the cells until they eventually go out of the antiviral state.

Sendai virus (SeV) is highly pathogenic for mice. In contrast, mice (including SCID mice) infected with simian virus 5 (SV5) showed no overt signs of disease. Evidence is presented that a major factor which prevented SV5 from productively infecting mice was its inability to circumvent the interferon (IFN) response in mice. Thus, in murine cells that produce and respond to IFN, SV5 protein synthesis was rapidly switched off. In marked contrast, once SeV protein synthesis began, it continued, even if the culture medium was supplemented with alpha/beta IFN (IFN-α/β). However, in human cells, IFN-α/β did not inhibit the replication of either SV5 or SeV once virus protein synthesis was established. To begin to address the molecular basis for these observations, the effects of SeV and SV5 infections on the activation of an IFN-α/β-responsive promoter and on that of the IFN-β promoter were examined in transient transfection experiments. The results demonstrated that (i) SeV, but not SV5, inhibited an IFN-α/β-responsive promoter in murine cells; (ii) both SV5 and SeV inhibited the activation of an IFN-α/β-responsive promoter in human cells; and (iii) in both human and murine cells, SeV was a strong inducer of the IFN-β promoter, whereas SV5 was a poor inducer. The ability of SeV and SV5 to inhibit the activation of IFN-responsive genes in human cells was confirmed by RNase protection experiments. The importance of these results in terms of paramyxovirus pathogenesis is discussed.

A series of experiments were undertaken to examine how interferon and neutralizing antibodies influence the ability of simian virus 5 (SV5) (strain W3) to establish and maintain persistent infections in murine cells. In contrast to the rapid decline in SV5 protein synthesis observed in murine BALB/c fibroblasts (BF cells), which produce and respond to interferon, between 24 and 48 h postinfection there was no inhibition of virus protein synthesis in MSFI ؊ cells, skin fibroblasts derived from alpha/beta-interferon receptor knockout BALB/c mice. Furthermore, the addition of anti-interferon antibodies to the culture medium of infected BF cells significantly reduced the observed decline in virus protein synthesis. Following infection of untreated BF cells, the majority replicated virus but survived the infection and eventually cleared the virus after 8 to 15 days. However, not all the cells were cured, and the cultures became persistently infected. Upon passage of persistently infected cultures, the virus fluxed between active and repressed states as a consequence of interferon production. This resulted in a balance being reached in which only 5 to 20% of the cells were infected at any one time. After 30 passages of the persistently infected cells, highly fusogenic virus variants arose (one of which was isolated and termed W3-f). W3-f remained as sensitive to interferon as the parental W3 isolate but, in the absence of interferon, spread much more rapidly than the parental W3 strain through BF cell monolayers. Sequence analysis revealed no deduced amino acid differences between the F proteins of W3 and W3-f. BF cell cultures persistently infected with W3-f were rapidly cleared of virus by the addition of virus-neutralizing antibodies to the culture medium. In contrast, neutralizing antibodies had little effect on the numbers of cells persistently infected with W3 over several passages. These results suggest that the ability of paramyxoviruses to cause cell-cell fusion may be selected for in vivo as a consequence of their adaptation to the interferon response rather than their need to escape from neutralizing antibodies. The significance of these observations with regard to persistent parainfluenza virus infections in vivo is further discussed.