The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of microbial plaque and gingival inflammation to the placement of porcelain laminate veneers on anterior teeth. 9 patients, 7 female and 2 male (mean age of 30 years), with a total of 35 veneers were examined. The volume of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), level of neutral proteolytic enzyme activity, gingival index (GI), plaque index (PlI) and plaque bacteria vitality were measured at baseline and after the placement of veneers. The volume of GCF increased after the placement of veneers (p = 0.03). No statistically significant differences were found in proteolytic enzyme activity or GI (p > 0.05). There were statistically significant reductions in PlI (p = 0.000) and plaque bacteria vitality (p = 0.018). Further research is required to assess the long-term influence of porcelain laminate veneers on gingival health and microbial plaque characteristics.
24 adult patients suffering from Adult periodontitis were assigned to 4 groups: the 1st rinsed for 1 min with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX); the 2nd group were irrigated for 15 s with 0.2% CHX in a pulsed oral irrigator; the 3rd group rinsed for 1 min with saline and the 4th group were irrigated for 15 s with saline. Plaque vitality was measured after the 4 experimental procedures, using the method described by Netuschil et al. and scored using the method described by Rundegren et al. The results showed that a single rinse or irrigation with 0.2% CHX solution decreased the % of viable micro‐organisms, but the vitality of the bacteria remained unchanged in saline groups. Statistical analysis indicated that irrigation with CHX was more effective at reducing plaque vitality than rinsing with CHX.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.