For most patients with acute renal colic, parenteral analgesia resulted in complete symptom resolution. When initial medical treatment was successful, patient morbidity was low. In these patients, immediate radiological imaging did not lead to reduced morbidity compared with radiological imaging after 2-3 weeks.
AimsTo assess fesoterodine 8 mg efficacy over time and vs. placebo in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) who responded suboptimally to tolterodine extended release (ER) 4 mg.MethodsIn a 12-week, double-blind trial, subjects with self-reported OAB symptoms for ≥ 6 months, mean of ≥ 8 micturitions and ≥ 2 to < 15 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes/24 h, and suboptimal response to tolterodine ER 4 mg (defined as ≤ 50% reduction in UUI episodes during 2-week run-in) were randomised to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week, 8 mg for 11 weeks) or placebo once daily. Change from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary end-point) was analysed in step-wise fashion: first, baseline vs. week 12 for fesoterodine; if significant, then change from baseline to week 12 for fesoterodine vs. placebo.ResultsBy week 12, subjects receiving fesoterodine 8 mg had significantly greater improvement from baseline vs. placebo in UUI episodes, urgency episodes and scores on the Patient Perception of Bladder Control, Urgency Perception Scale and OAB Questionnaire Symptom Bother and Health-Related Quality of Life scales and domains (all p < 0.05). 50% and 70% UUI responder rates were also significantly higher with fesoterodine 8 mg vs. placebo at week 12 (p < 0.05). Dry mouth (placebo, 4%, 12/301; fesoterodine, 16.6%, 51/308) and constipation (placebo, 1.3%, 4/301; fesoterodine, 3.9%, 12/308) were the most frequent adverse events.ConclusionsSubjects who responded suboptimally to tolterodine ER 4 mg showed significant improvements in UUI and other OAB symptoms and patient-reported outcomes, with good tolerability, during treatment with fesoterodine 8 mg vs. placebo.
Transection with resection and end-to-end anastomosis is a good method for bulbar stricture with a low rate of sexual dysfunction and a high success rate postoperatively. To avoid penile angulation/shortening, it might be wise to use the onlay technique for longer and distal strictures.
The occurrence of bacteria and Ureaplasma urealyticum in the upper urinary tract was studied in 50 patients operated on for renal stones. Cultures were performed on voided urine, pelvic urine obtained during surgery and the stone. The chemical composition of the stones was analysed. Twenty-six stones were of metabolic origin and 24 infection-induced, i.e. composed of struvite and/or carbonate-apatite. Ureaplasma urealyticum was cultured from the upper urinary tract in 1 patient with metabolic stones, and in 7 with infection stones. In 4 of these 7 patients no other urease-producing micro-organism was detected, suggesting that Ureaplasma urealyticum may have been associated with stone formation in these patients.
In a prospective, randomized study, the prophylactic effect of indomethacin (150 mg daily) in regard to recurrence of ureteral colic was investigated in 78 patients. Severe recurrent attacks were experienced in 78 patients. Severe recurrent attacks were experienced by 4 of 37 patients in the test group and by 16 of the 41 controls without indomethacin. The mean duration of recurrent pain including the severe attacks was 5.6 +/- 1.1 hour/patient/week in the test group and 12.5 +/- 2.9 in the control group. Passage of stone within 7 days was not influenced by indomethacin (22/37 and 25/41 cases). Indomethacin administration for 7 days after an acute attack of ureteral colic thus reduced the frequency of severe attacks and the total duration of recurrent pain, without influencing the stone passage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.