No abstract

BackgroundThe severity of epicardial coronary stenosis can be assessed by invasive measurements of trans-stenotic pressure drop and flow. A pressure or flow sensor-tipped guidewire inserted across the coronary stenosis causes an overestimation in true trans-stenotic pressure drop and reduction in coronary flow. This may mask the true severity of coronary stenosis. In order to unmask the true severity of epicardial stenosis, we evaluate a diagnostic parameter, which is obtained from fundamental fluid dynamics principles. This experimental and numerical study focuses on the characterization of the diagnostic parameter, pressure drop coefficient, and also evaluates the pressure recovery downstream of stenoses.MethodsThree models of coronary stenosis namely, moderate, intermediate and severe stenosis, were manufactured and tested in the in-vitro set-up simulating the epicardial coronary network. The trans-stenotic pressure drop and flow distal to stenosis models were measured by non-invasive method, using external pressure and flow sensors, and by invasive method, following guidewire insertion across the stenosis. The viscous and momentum-change components of the pressure drop for various flow rates were evaluated from quadratic relation between pressure drop and flow. Finally, the pressure drop coefficient (CDPe) was calculated as the ratio of pressure drop and distal dynamic pressure. The pressure recovery factor (η) was calculated as the ratio of pressure recovery coefficient and the area blockage.ResultsThe mean pressure drop-flow characteristics before and during guidewire insertion indicated that increasing stenosis causes a shift in dominance from viscous pressure to momentum forces. However, for intermediate (~80%) area stenosis, which is between moderate (~65%) and severe (~90%) area stenoses, both losses were similar in magnitude. Therefore, guidewire insertion plays a critical role in evaluating the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenosis. More importantly, mean CDPe increased (17 ± 3.3 to 287 ± 52, n = 3, p < 0.01) and mean η decreased (0.54 ± 0.04 to 0.37 ± 0.05, p < 0.01) from moderate to severe stenosis during guidewire insertion.ConclusionThe wide range of CDPe is not affected that much by the presence of guidewire. CDPe can be used in clinical practice to evaluate the true severity of coronary stenosis due to its significant difference between values measured at moderate and severe stenoses.

To evaluate the local hemodynamic implications of coronary artery balloon angioplasty, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was applied in a group of patients previously reported by [Wilson et al. (1988), 77, pp. 873-885] with representative stenosis geometry post-angioplasty and with measured values of coronary flow reserve returning to a normal range (3.6 +/- 0.3). During undisturbed flow in the absence of diagnostic catheter sensors within the lesions, the computed mean pressure drop delta p was only about 1 mmHg at basal flow, and increased moderately to about 8 mmHg for hyperemic flow. Corresponding elevated levels of mean wall shear stress in the midthroat region of the residual stenoses, which are common after angioplasty procedures, increased from about 60 to 290 dynes/cm2 during hyperemia. The computations (Ree approximately equal to 100-400; alpha e = 2.25) indicated that the pulsatile flow field was principally quasi-steady during the cardiac cycle, but there was phase lag in the pressure drop-mean velocity (delta p - u) relation. Time-averaged pressure drop values, delta p, were about 20 percent higher than calculated pressure drop values, delta ps, for steady flow, similar to previous in vitro measurements by Cho et al. (1983). In the throat region, viscous effects were confined to the near-wall region, and entrance effects were evident during the cardiac cycle. Proximal to the lesion, velocity profiles deviated from parabolic shape at lower velocities during the cardiac cycle. The flow field was very complex in the oscillatory separated flow reattachment region in the distal vessel where pressure recovery occurred. These results may also serve as a useful reference against catheter-measured pressure drops and velocity ratios (hemodynamic endpoints) and arteriographic (anatomic) endpoints post-angioplasty. Some comparisons to previous studies of flow through stenoses models are also shown for perspective purposes.

No abstract

An experimental investigation of water flow through an abrupt circular-channel expansion is described over a Reynolds number range between 20 and 4200. The shear layer between the central jet and the reverse flow region along the wall downstream behaved differently in the various flow regimes that were observed. With increasing Reynolds number these regimes changed progressively from a laminar flow to an unstable vortex sheetlike flow and then to a more random fluctuating flow. The distance between the step and the reattachment location downstream correspondingly increased, reached a maximum, and then decreased. Of particular significance are the shear layer wave instabilities observed in the shear flow and their relationship to rettachment which apparently has not received much attention previously. Visual observations aided in understanding the results.