We review the problem of spectral estimation from velocity data
sampled irregularly in time by a laser Doppler anemometer (LDA) from very early
estimators based on slot correlation to more refined estimators, which build
upon a signal reconstruction and an equidistant re-sampling in time. The
discussion is restricted to single realization anemometry, i.e. excluding
multiple particle signals. We classify the techniques and make an initial
assessment before describing currently used methods in more detail. An
intimately related subject, the simulation of LDA data, is then briefly
reviewed, since this provides a means of evaluating various estimators. Using
the expectation and variance as figures of merit, the advantages and
disadvantages of several estimators for varying types of turbulent velocity
spectral distributions are discussed. A set of recommendations is put forward
as a conclusion.
The estimation of turbulence power spectra from randomly sampled laser Doppler anemometer (LDA) data can be done via the autocorrelation function (ACF) approach, whereby the slotting technique has the advantage that the ACF can be estimated at any data rate. Two improvements on Mayo's slotting technique for estimating the ACF, `local normalization' and the `fuzzy slotting technique', were proposed and compared in a benchmark test. However, it proved possible to merge these approaches and the resulting algorithm produced correlation coefficients with a lower variance than either of the individual algorithms. This lower variance in the ACF estimates can then be capitalized upon in order to produce better estimates of the turbulence power spectrum.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.