Arachidonylethanolamide, an arachidonic acid derivative in porcine brain, was identified in a screen for endogenous ligands for the cannabinoid receptor. The structure of this compound, which has been named "anandamide," was determined by mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and was confirmed by synthesis. Anandamide inhibited the specific binding of a radiolabeled cannabinoid probe to synaptosomal membranes in a manner typical of competitive ligands and produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of the electrically evoked twitch response to the mouse vas deferens, a characteristic effect of psychotropic cannabinoids. These properties suggest that anandamide may function as a natural ligand for the cannabinoid receptor.

No abstract

1 (7)-Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychotropic component of Cannabis with possible therapeutic use as an anti-in¯ammatory drug. Little is known on the possible molecular targets of this compound. We investigated whether CBD and some of its derivatives interact with vanilloid receptor type 1 (VR1), the receptor for capsaicin, or with proteins that inactivate the endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide (AEA). 2 CBD and its enantiomer, (+)-CBD, together with seven analogues, obtained by exchanging the C-7 methyl group of CBD with a hydroxy-methyl or a carboxyl function and/or the C-5' pentyl group with a di-methyl-heptyl (DMH) group, were tested on: (a) VR1-mediated increase in cytosolic Ca 2+ concentrations in cells over-expressing human VR1; (b) [ 14 C]-AEA uptake by RBL-2H3 cells, which is facilitated by a selective membrane transporter; and (c) [ 14 C]-AEA hydrolysis by rat brain membranes, which is catalysed by the fatty acid amide hydrolase. 3 Both CBD and (+)-CBD, but not the other analogues, stimulated VR1 with EC 50 =3.2 ± 3.5 mM, and with a maximal e ect similar in e cacy to that of capsaicin, i.e. 67 ± 70% of the e ect obtained with ionomycin (4 mM). CBD (10 mM) desensitized VR1 to the action of capsaicin. The e ects of maximal doses of the two compounds were not additive. 4 (+)-5'-DMH-CBD and (+)-7-hydroxy-5'-DMH-CBD inhibited [ 14 C]-AEA uptake (IC 50 =10.0 and 7.0 mM); the (7)-enantiomers were slightly less active (IC 50 =14.0 and 12.5 mM). CBD and (+)-CBD were also active (IC 50 =22.0 and 17.0 mM). 5 CBD (IC 50 =27.5 mM), (+)-CBD (IC 50 =63.5 mM) and (7)-7-hydroxy-CBD (IC 50 =34 mM), but not the other analogues (IC 50 4100 mM), weakly inhibited [ 14 C]-AEA hydrolysis. 6 Only the (+)-isomers exhibited high a nity for CB 1 and/or CB 2 cannabinoid receptors. 7 These ®ndings suggest that VR1 receptors, or increased levels of endogenous AEA, might mediate some of the pharmacological e ects of CBD and its analogues. In view of the facile high yield synthesis, and the weak a nity for CB 1 and CB 2 receptors, (7)-5'-DMH-CBD represents a valuable candidate for further investigation as inhibitor of AEA uptake and a possible new therapeutic agent.

Covering up to January 2016Cannabis sativa L. is a prolific, but not exclusive, producer of a diverse group of isoprenylated resorcinyl polyketides collectively known as phytocannabinoids. The modular nature of the pathways that merge into the phytocannabinoid chemotype translates in differences in the nature of the resorcinyl side-chain and the degree of oligomerization of the isoprenyl residue, making the definition of phytocannabinoid elusive from a structural standpoint. A biogenetic definition is therefore proposed, splitting the phytocannabinoid chemotype into an alkyl- and a β-aralklyl version, and discussing the relationships between phytocannabinoids from different sources (higher plants, liverworts, fungi). The startling diversity of cannabis phytocannabinoids might be, at least in part, the result of non-enzymatic transformations induced by heat, light, and atmospheric oxygen on a limited set of major constituents (CBG, CBD, Δ-THC and CBC and their corresponding acidic versions), whose degradation is detailed to emphasize this possibility. The diversity of metabotropic (cannabinoid receptors), ionotropic (thermos-TRPs), and transcription factors (PPARs) targeted by phytocannabinoids is discussed. The integrated inventory of these compounds and their biological macromolecular end-points highlights the opportunities that phytocannabinoids offer to access desirable drug-like space beyond the one associated to the narcotic target CB.