Haemodynamic responses to maximal exercise were similar for both exercise modes in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury. The lower cardiac output in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury compared with able-bodied individuals at equivalent workloads reflects the inability of the circulatory system to increase stroke volume.
Study design: The study is conducted on the basis of comparative-repeated measures. Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the reliability of non-invasive cardiac output (CO) measurements in individuals with tetraplegia (TP) at rest and during exercise using Innocor, and to test the hypothesis that CO measurements are less reliable in TP than in able-bodied (AB) individuals. Setting: Ambulatory volunteers, Switzerland. Methods: Nine male motor-complete TP (C5-C7) and nine pair-matched AB performed repeated CO measurements at rest and during submaximal arm-crank and wheelchair exercises in four different test sessions. Within-and between-day reliabilities were compared between TP and AB. Results: Mean differences between measurements at rest (TP vs AB, within-day: 0.1±0.5 vs 0.2 ± 0.6 l min À1 , between-day: À0.7 ± 0.6 vs À0.1 ± 0.8 l min À1 ), during arm-crank (TP vs AB, withinday: 0.1±0.9 vs 0.5±0.7 l min À1 , between-day: À0.3±1.1 vs 0.0±1.1 l min À1 ) and wheelchair exercises (TP vs AB, within-day: 0.3 ± 1.2 vs -0.1 ± 0.8 l min À1 , between-day: 0.1 ± 1.1 vs 0.5±0.9 l min À1 ) were not significantly different between TP and AB (all P40.05). Coefficients of variation in TP (within-day, rest: 6.8%, arm-crank: 9.6% and wheelchair: 10.8%; between-day, rest: 11.9%, arm-crank: 11.2% and wheelchair: 10.3%) and in AB (within-day, rest: 7.7%, arm crank: 6.8% and wheelchair: 6.0%; between-day, rest: 9.2%, arm crank: 8.5% and wheelchair: 8.0%) indicated acceptable reliability. Conclusion: In contrast to our hypothesis, we found non-invasive CO measurements using Innocor to be as reliable in TP as they are in AB. Consequently, Innocor can be recommended for repeated assessments of CO in TP within routine diagnostics or for evaluation of training progress.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.