A retrospective, comparative cohort study was performed of metacarpophalangeal or proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis with either tension band (n = 28) or compression (Acutrak Mini) screw (n = 29) methods. We compared rate of union, healing time, complications, and re-operation rate. Union was achieved in 26/28 (92.8%) of the tension band group (9.4 weeks) and 24/28 (85.7%) of the compression screw group (9.8 weeks). Only 28 patients in the screw group were assessed for union as one patient in the screw group sustained a fracture at the time of insertion and was converted to tension band fixation. The complication rate was 8/28 (28.6%) in the tension band group and 8/29 (27.6%) in the compression screw group. Re-operation rate was 9/28 (32.1%) in the tension band group and 1/29 (3.6%) in the compression screw group. Our findings indicate that bone healing, healing time, and complications are similar in both groups. The tension band technique had a significantly higher re-operation rate (hardware removal), but was the technique for salvage following failure of the screw technique.

We have performed, between May 1985 and December 1988, in situ lithotripsy in 100 consecutive cases of primary ureteral stones, using electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 33 patients and ultrasonic lithotripsy in the remaining 67. After using similar instruments and surgical techniques in both groups, we have comparatively evaluated the complications encountered and the results obtained. With the electrohydraulic lithotripsy we have obtained a complication rate of 42% (operative and postoperative) and favorable results in 72.7% of the patients; using ultrasonic lithotripsy, the complication rate was 10.4%, and favorable results were obtained in 92.5%. We conclude that, at least in our experience, ultrasonic lythotripsy is less invasive and more successful than electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the treatment of primary stone disease.

No abstract