Wall stress analysis at maximal systolic blood pressure is a promising technique to detect aneurysms at elevated aneurysm rupture risk. Since no significant differences were found at uniform blood pressure, the need for adequate blood pressure control in aneurysm patients is reiterated.
Context Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the key test for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA), but its interpretation varies widely across referral centers and this can adversely affect the management of PA patients. Objectives To investigate in a real-life study the rate of bilateral success and identification of unilateral aldosteronism and their impact on blood pressure outcomes in PA subtyped by AVS. Design and settings In a retrospective analysis of the largest international registry of individual AVS data (AVIS-2 study), we investigated how different cut-off values of the selectivity index (SI) and lateralization index (LI) affected rate of bilateral success, identification of unilateral aldosteronism, and blood pressure outcomes. Results AVIS-2 recruited 1625 individual AVS studies performed between 2000 and 2015 in 19 tertiary referral centers. Under unstimulated conditions, the rate of biochemically confirmed bilateral AVS success progressively decreased with increasing SI cut-offs; furthermore, with currently used LI cut-offs, the rate of identified unilateral PA leading to adrenalectomy was as low as <25%. A within-patient pairwise comparison of 402 AVS performed both under unstimulated and cosyntropin-stimulated conditions showed that cosyntropin increased the confirmed rate of bilateral selectivity for SI cut-offs ≥ 2.0, but reduced lateralization rates (P < 0.001). Post-adrenalectomy outcomes were not improved by use of cosyntropin or more restrictive diagnostic criteria. Conclusion Commonly used SI and LI cut-offs are associated with disappointingly low rates of biochemically defined AVS success and identified unilateral PA. Evidence-based protocols entailing less restrictive interpretative cut-offs might optimize the clinical use of this costly and invasive test. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab XX: 0-0, 2020)
Thoracic stent-graft collapse may be asymptomatic underscoring the importance of stent-graft surveillance. Endovascular management of collapse is possible in most cases using a large balloon expandable stent. Symptomatic collapse is associated with high morbidity and mortality.
A drenal hypertension caused by primary aldosteronism comprises the most common curable form of secondary hypertension. In the analytic workup of patients with primary aldosteronism, adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is recommended for establishing the origins of excess production of hormones.1 AVS is a technically demanding procedure in which correct cannulation of the adrenal veins, especially the right, can pose significant difficulty. 2,3 Correct positioning of the catheter is verified by measurement of plasma cortisol concentrations. High cortisol concentrations in adrenal blood compared with peripheral blood ascertain correct catheter placement and thus selective sampling. Because cortisol has a long circulating halflife (100 minutes), increases in adrenal vein (AV) blood above levels of peripheral venous (PV) blood are relatively minor and subsequently subject to interpretative error. Furthermore, as a result of physiological corticotropin fluctuations, cortisol is secreted in a variable fashion so that fluctuating levels can interfere with the interpretation of AVS selectivity. [4][5][6] This problem can be overcome using cosyntropin stimulation. 7 Cosyntropin stimulation, however, adds to the complexity of the procedure and for this reason is not always used.With the above considerations in mind, there seems a need for more reliable parameters than cortisol in assessing the correct positioning of catheters during AVS.8 Plasma metanephrine, the O-methylated metabolite of epinephrine, represents one such alternative analyte. More than 90% of plasma metanephrine is produced within the adrenal medulla, with <10% produced from epinephrine after release from the adrenals. 7 Compared with cortisol, plasma metanephrine has a short circulating half-life of 3 to 6 minutes, resulting in close to 90-fold increases of AV compared with PV concentrations in situations where catheters are correctly positioned.7 Such large Abstract-Adrenal vein sampling is used to establish the origins of excess production of adrenal hormones in primary aldosteronism. Correct catheter positioning is confirmed using adrenal vein measurements of cortisol, but this parameter is not always reliable. Plasma metanephrine represents an alternative parameter. The objective of our study was to determine the use of plasma metanephrine concentrations to establish correct catheter positioning during adrenal vein sampling with and without cosyntropin stimulation. We included 52 cosyntropin-stimulated and 34 nonstimulated sequential procedures. Plasma cortisol and metanephrine concentrations were measured in adrenal and peripheral venous samples. Success rates of sampling, using an adrenal to peripheral cortisol selectivity index of 3.0, were compared with success rates of metanephrine using a selectivity index determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Among procedures assessed as selective using cortisol, the adrenal to peripheral vein ratio of metanephrine was 6-fold higher than that of cortisol (94.0 versus 15.5; P<0.0001). Ther...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.