TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractMany heavy oil and oil sand reservoirs are in communication with water sand(s). Depending on the density ( o API gravity) of oil, the water sand could lie above or below the oil zone. Steamflooding a heavy oil or oil sand reservoir with a contiguous water sand (water which may lie below or above the oil-bearing zone) is risky due to the possibility of short circuiting the steam chamber.
Horizontal wells have been shown to be successful in improving oil recovery for marginal heavy oil reservoirs in Saskatchewan and Alberta. One commonly encountered problem in recovery operations for these poorly consolidated reservoirs is the production of sand and fines into the horizontal wellbore, where they settle and accumulate. This paper reports the numerical modeling of gravitational deposition of sand in a horizontal well in such heavy oil reservoirs. The numerical model described in this work examines the transport process mechanistically, based on the conservation equations for the fluid phase (heavy oil) and the solid phase (sand particles). The interaction between these phases is described by empirical correlations. The equations are solved numerically to determine the concentration of sand particles and oil, and their respective pressure and velocity distributions inside the horizontal well. According to the simulation results, oil viscosity and particle size play important roles in the transport process, including controlling the gravitational settling tendency of solid particles inside the horizontal wellbore. The results provide insight into the roles different mechanisms affect the transport of sand particles; as such, they provide guidelines for production operations involving horizontal wells in poorly consolidated and unconsolidated reservoirs. Introduction The use of horizontal wells, in Saskatchewan and Alberta heavy oil reservoirs underlain with bottom-water, has been found to improve primary recovery performance prior to water coning-recovering up to 15%, in some cases, of the initial oil in place, compared with only 5% for a vertical well(1). Horizontal wells have also been successfully used for increasing steamflood recovery(2,3). Due to the unconsolidated or poorly consolidated nature of these reservoirs, solid (sand and fines) production is quite prevalent. The produced solids lead to several production problems, including sand filling up the wellbore, preventing the operation of downhole pumps and surface equipment, etc.(4) In horizontal well cases, sand production potentially poses a serious problem, as the sand could settle and accumulate inside the horizontal wellbore. This settlement and accumulation of sand particles could give rise to reduced cross-sectional areas of the wellbore open to flow. The study reported in this paper examines, using numerical simulation, the gravitational deposition of sand particles inside a horizontal wellbore. A brief survey of the relevant literature is given in the following. Solid-liquid multiphase flows are usually very complex, due to the large number of variables involved in the transport processes, and typically poorly understood interaction between the variables. There have been many experimental investigations of these (and other) flow processes, particularly focused on the deposition of the solid particles. Many of the earliest investigations of solid liquid flows focused on the settling tendency of solid particles. Richardson and Zaki(5) experimentally determined that the falling velocity of a suspension relative to a horizontal plane was equal to the upward velocity of the fluid required to maintain a suspension at the same concentration. For different flow regimes (i.e., Reynolds numbers), separate correlations were developed (from experimental data) for the exponent which corresponds to the slope of log-log plot straight lines between suspension falling velocities and suspension porosities.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractMany heavy oil and oil sand reservoirs are in communication with water sand(s). Depending on the density ( o API gravity) of oil, the water sand could lie above or below the oil zone. Steamflooding a heavy oil or oil sand reservoir with a contiguous water sand (water which may lie below or above the oil-bearing zone) is risky due to the possibility of short circuiting the steam chamber.
28Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology FIGURE 4: Ratio of steam injected to fluid (oil and water) produced. FIGURE 7: Recovery efficiency: Confined water sand 6 m thick. FIGURE 5: Percentage of heat accumulated, produced and loss. FIGURE 6: Ratio of heat accumulated to heat injected-Confined water sands 6 m thick. FIGURE 9: Ratio of heat accumulated to heat injectedUnconfined water sands 6 m thick. FIGURE 10: Ratio of heat accumulated to heat injectedUnconfined water sands 9 m thick. FIGURE 8: Recovery efficiency: Unonfined water sand 6 m thick. FIGURE 11: Recovery efficiency: Unconfined water sand 9 m thick.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.